MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <171085360143.2046436.7217841141682511557.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org>
 <CAPpHfdu+iX5TP65Cyn6vUe8JKGtLmMA=sKKKgE7tB6G6Qk=18Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALT9ZEHhVt-i1vGL_eCfNqAisTiC6VaM6U-fxP3kD306uPLEcw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPpHfdsEtAWhpcPEaUky+gO20=rz0P03OskAS0c8teuTtHP9hQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALT9ZEGTFdwrP+jO1tKxHHeGPM-enMm734MP0wCwJTQZDembYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPpHfdst=eqJ8-n=yhSk=5Xk2QHLF90HWryHWgARuityB3=b7A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+TgmobHYix=Nn8D4RUHa6fhUVPR88KGAMq1pBfnGfOfEjRixA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPpHfdt_Apbzjx-q2moST3VyNq9Shx8ByGxTF-aqBs3Gaf_n-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+TgmoY0=bT_xBP8csR=MFE=FxGE2n2-me2-31jBOgEcLvW7ug@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPpHfdtp3_H_Rp1ubVYGUnnF0fXbam7+OOG_EMnWos1x2a_3Zg@mail.gmail.com>
 <859476bf-3cb0-455e-b093-b8ab5ef17f0e@postgrespro.ru> <CA+TgmoZux8hzQ0=1-Rvigm9VuojW0aHiGSzL+G_g43qyrLGiSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <f56c654f-f152-4dc8-b221-4d4484bed612@postgrespro.ru> <CAPpHfdtXDuBaHscJn-wada6Kaf3fxmS4k-1TTVhpS+Kx=uveyw@mail.gmail.com>
 <4e2764f7-f6be-478f-8d7f-f921dbd10f5f@postgrespro.ru>
In-Reply-To: <4e2764f7-f6be-478f-8d7f-f921dbd10f5f@postgrespro.ru>
From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 11:22:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPpHfdv2V2tsvVn5LYyrJkzmPA==vbdCEKiT8j9yaaiDTfaQtA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands
To: Dmitry Koval <d.koval@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAPpHfdv2V2tsvVn5LYyrJkzmPA%3D%3DvbdCEKiT8j9yaaiDTfaQtA%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 11:01=E2=80=AFPM Dmitry Koval <d.koval@postgrespro.r=
u> wrote:
>  >I see fixes for the issues mentioned in [1] and [2] are still not
>  >implemented.  Do you plan to do this in this release cycle?
>
> I would like to make some changes, but I think it would be appropriate
> to discuss these points first.
> As far as I understand, there is currently no clear opinion on how to
> implement [1] and [2].
>
>
> I would appreciate your opinions on what improvements are really needed
> and in what order they should be implemented.

Please, check my thoughts on how this patch could be further
developed.  Given amount of work to be done, I doubt that'a a subject
for pg18.  But I think you could continue this work, and we could
consider it for early pg19 cycle.

Links.
1. https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAPpHfdtSxrcxQERO82cyQ2heN3%2BA7VC=
63k8SmL%3DEEiph-8rfHg%40mail.gmail.com
2. https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAPpHfdvVMdUX0DGSK3oAbt9C5TPup%3DB=
Eq8QkmvDrMbuD4BR9Fw%40mail.gmail.com

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase