Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qTOau-009RGx-9R for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 15:26:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qTOas-00H2Mr-2p for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 15:25:58 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qTOar-00H2Mj-Pp for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 15:25:58 +0000 Received: from mail-ot1-x332.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::332]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qTOap-001JAH-Jy for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 15:25:57 +0000 Received: by mail-ot1-x332.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-6bd0425ad4fso757762a34.2 for ; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 08:25:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=neon-tech.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1691508353; x=1692113153; h=in-reply-to:references:subject:from:to:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=BQ9qZnJaFaJ4YYcwA+Uev4yH/RecGVclivstWcsyr9o=; b=0JCWBHi9ew4PU6lHRPDEive0rvNuo1+wCKC0aW+EbiRUWY9QGMUYBrU+D/ToWdTdRQ ObVRMSESBUcwAOCk7x6hBRDCenoJhbt0fkQ1JlinFzysn7aHm19ezT/0jnZw6D+30D2T nANii1lvk47cjmcdbREB/Y/Kj6UAi1tA9OKjcMRUOwhbPdBN1WGD9iMae1LyCILbddgl WAv9q4UJgeyY6O9FHfR3chwRsQjOvB6iJ2sK659aNE7bWE85vxsbGrd2gLgWuv5T+E9K ZOO4mCmrgof6n+JSW14h6779wv1deE674wOaveqg3t/wVGtChfYUknSeibYAJDLQkgsh KKcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691508353; x=1692113153; h=in-reply-to:references:subject:from:to:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BQ9qZnJaFaJ4YYcwA+Uev4yH/RecGVclivstWcsyr9o=; b=Gy/uF/M10pKglB1SFNb9h7UZ+mmy1K3qFiVaZ90aTtL9+CUzUBP/Q120sB9I62HNEO 8VdtP9IzpE0ESPEbtsAYwt7hkKcvGpe1gp1f+eqf2dj39L6/SpM0yYL+4DKC6WlC0EVu PEzjBYtvmG7PBNJWfVbI1TETenkGR1z4AgfQiiXFmMkOSWgbXYCcwAfOzvdxI0LRfEd2 VbyEbqXGIgND2ckCfHHZ5sc6PpLxrWbQLLATm3sgqkE9n6HObTJq1Siv28SBro5+fPiz EBKEQyBi/RYia+2R09abZTVD28WIU0nsm7uxeEm/PpRBNP2xSAfqDZ/+SDU8jfyOcU1J r1dg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx1TzoPMEkRxnLu7Hrp2kBuj/ro8643mP1+y2mOcBTKR+7MWyNL CP7oIpZReTxt03dsz7doMy/AtkajZzeXO4M/SzA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH1FULwCA6aibQU/5926hXgUQBGcIs/95wA7iNoId2tuzWcTuqmHFxi3Dhvhli+V9oyJ2llLQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:4688:b0:1bc:11ec:1752 with SMTP id a8-20020a056870468800b001bc11ec1752mr14192500oap.36.1691508353550; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 08:25:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2607:fb90:e631:422:3996:e070:71ee:42fb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e15-20020a056871044f00b001bb58a346b8sm6158427oag.18.2023.08.08.08.25.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Aug 2023 08:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=Flowed Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2023 10:25:52 -0500 Message-Id: To: "Andres Freund" , , "Thomas Munro" , "Justin Pryzby" From: "Tristan Partin" Subject: Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc? X-Mailer: aerc 0.15.2-129-g9bf783c258ad References: <20230808021541.7lbzdefvma7qmn3w@awork3.anarazel.de> In-Reply-To: <20230808021541.7lbzdefvma7qmn3w@awork3.anarazel.de> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Mon Aug 7, 2023 at 9:15 PM CDT, Andres Freund wrote: > FWIW: with the patches applied, the "credit costs" in cirrus CI are rough= ly > like the following (depends on caching etc): > > task costs in credits > linux-sanity: 0.01 > linux-compiler-warnings: 0.05 > linux-meson: 0.07 > freebsd : 0.08 > linux-autoconf: 0.09 > windows : 0.18 > macos : 0.28 > total task runtime is 40.8 > cost in credits is 0.76, monthly credits of 50 allow approx 66.10 runs/mo= nth I am not in the loop on the autotools vs meson stuff. How much longer do=20 we anticipate keeping autotools around? Seems like it could be a good=20 opportunity to reduce some CI usage if autotools were finally dropped,=20 but I know there are still outstanding tasks to complete. Back of the napkin math says autotools is about 12% of the credit cost,=20 though I haven't looked to see if linux-meson and linux-autotools are=20 1:1. --=20 Tristan Partin Neon (https://neon.tech)