Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1viSyh-00762b-1G for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2026 07:50:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1viSyg-005Ybj-1G for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2026 07:50:10 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1viSyg-005Yba-08 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2026 07:50:10 +0000 Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1viSyd-001YXi-1t for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2026 07:50:09 +0000 Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b79f8f7ea43so1444393366b.2 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 23:50:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jeltef.nl; s=google; t=1768981805; x=1769586605; darn=postgresql.org; h=in-reply-to:references:cc:from:to:subject:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=TnvWYVJNppMgikyyUsHkOpWtoKgT1zae3/Gy8FzkMOA=; b=A079bxsCaetICHK1sWFspAObEWfj5tCHVyMPQbUlPAh5YryKaDF0fJv24ZCbJWgxWb LTAudNn3i0n9tscUsAO8wALzIFzbJuW2effkaRZ/qzHUHL4xyytfOjjiEI2N//PHHvj6 pEqXZcAehk1l+/znJ2n+3Awdpg0JSlNO/IyTfG5l69twORus9YSZ5Os6CUzuD5cBn3co Q3SaRJrz0tbx2CitYK+JM8nOxtXa3p53ekrEyktSp0PD4tvPQmZ8GbREhHsdbpsazOS6 F33Nnrw6CBzdLPEEGzdJYoCAPjpVruVxDV+KbgFQ2VM9rkMiavd6KvzWuQc5dUGH8Y02 M/cQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1768981805; x=1769586605; h=in-reply-to:references:cc:from:to:subject:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TnvWYVJNppMgikyyUsHkOpWtoKgT1zae3/Gy8FzkMOA=; b=Gcn4L4jv08ob6qt1JcaBn8xOJGBq7HXvx23Oy55IOWeyEvsn1lffVZgxE5ZeXeD1zH u+x9ix+GfiEmxqxZGbp16+n2V9y9OfMvHFTmqJd3jmbPPftpaQZL3n+IRzDfaVzAP9c4 nKNn67hfHCoXSlseeo4buW/6MhnnDGiAS/8Fx8rUewUu0NJuYScHEyuBOSXIuLBo/i9z vE+AzHTsszTnXQbjIrsLzeLomrh/9tG+EmOCfnq1oy1/ggcICxmqogQuRrEbEhrTasTo caQ4lptqc10icTkvRB06ya0XZ2i9qQRrptTT0F45tbXiih85oUnczcPjLVpy7F/kkk79 4Y1g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzQytjb4EEPiW9wjTnQXSiCWJb78RLYKhqyhArnsCVAwAulckwI Y7yt6RQkjHrNfE9uV61ZCZzw6qhmF94flQ+cDSzEugL2e5GgbzsFSuMrf17A6QL7ATU= X-Gm-Gg: AZuq6aLyJ1/oPEqrpMgdo3uqnTVYtnBvwby5qz1wN/1NzjGaQDIYI+zfGW8KxUay7p7 4KWEyyEMF3kP7OQwrq9DpWG8iLsOMd4BR4WfivTxHJxh+w363EFS+67birvw45viEN4JEnOWv9R 8ip/2vRNnylIjTCtW5YIQy0g0KPosA5V5V6U2j50L/kzjcXSjFBD5KIuPhVc52Liul37XJsW6dh ad25S/73kr3q6xGbqz4O+g2Pic8dbREz7rHQB+z0WTUFnsM4OvQD7XTL7m1/SnfU0c86agGuFIh DuJb6s11peOs7AAufKldQP+DMPieI58S2gkyZYbSG8OL1N8B3keWGZ5bioRE1fm7W1c78smjRE9 qbNHg98zct+lSSOTBwpnRgp++/LVeQwiluCbY8fYDm11SfU0gdHsV2q9HCVMXmVwAxp1JAEGBku y4jYDk1pLTlk5APmcFxYHNfhcWYuz10YQUHT83/M8KPh0FFA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:86a2:b0:b83:f75d:ba2b with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b88003422eamr440861866b.32.1768981803893; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 23:50:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (145-53-221-196.fixed.kpn.net. [145.53.221.196]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-b8795a43679sm1525758166b.70.2026.01.20.23.50.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Jan 2026 23:50:03 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=Flowed Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 08:50:03 +0100 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reserve protocol 3.1 explicitly in pqcomm.h To: "Jacob Champion" , "Tom Lane" From: "Jelte Fennema-Nio" Cc: "PostgreSQL Hackers" X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.1-31-gf6db7c329ce0 References: <1935052.1768950649@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Wed Jan 21, 2026 at 12:17 AM CET, Jacob Champion wrote: > I'd be fine with either; slight preference for "RESERVED" I suppose? RESERVED seems clearer to me. And for people interested in why, the comment above its definition describes it suffiecently.