Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\))
Subject: Re: UUID v7
From: "Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
In-Reply-To: <Ze_t1zQA7veSKPGr@paquier.xyz>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:10:37 +0500
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>,
 Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>,
 pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
 Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>,
 Sergey Prokhorenko <sergeyprokhorenko@yahoo.com.au>,
 =?utf-8?Q?Przemys=C5=82aw_Sztoch?= <przemyslaw@sztoch.pl>,
 "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>,
 Mat Arye <mat@timescaledb.com>,
 Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>,
 Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov@gmail.com>,
 Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EEC50CCD-163F-40BB-B30F-B3C2F7183656@yandex-team.ru>
References: <1971811009.2132347.1706599708209@mail.yahoo.com>
 <72C1E7CB-E2EC-46CF-AD2C-B3180CED885B@yandex-team.ru>
 <CAEG8a3JUgkY3EMp393kJ+bcye8q=VHfQDTQz7Ci-moNVjhPLZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <0906F8BA-CA52-4956-AA68-E9193E50DFDF@yandex-team.ru>
 <10553e4c-6b66-44b9-86a7-80bb1958a767@eisentraut.org>
 <BFDA918D-1CB0-4980-A31F-C1AC95BE68F6@yandex-team.ru>
 <5D22C2BF-5DED-43CA-A3D7-B724EE0A159D@yandex-team.ru>
 <CAJ7c6TPOOpr-39CNz32oC_ruEAiqhPZ=PBe0OE+d-W4wjBabWA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGECzQRYit62xO=HqX7kAf8tELjZTsYc0LQ1LStUsaKSPqJu_w@mail.gmail.com>
 <844E6A65-4A36-4A36-94C2-0CDF7615B53F@yandex-team.ru>
 <Ze_t1zQA7veSKPGr@paquier.xyz>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/EEC50CCD-163F-40BB-B30F-B3C2F7183656%40yandex-team.ru>
Precedence: bulk


> On 12 Mar 2024, at 10:53, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>=20
> It does not strike me as a good idea to rush an implementation without
> a specification officially approved because there is always a risk of
> shipping something that's non-compliant into core.  But perhaps I am
> missing something on the RFC side?

Upthread one of document=E2=80=99s authors commented:

> On 14 Feb 2023, at 19:13, Kyzer Davis (kydavis) <kydavis@cisco.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> The point is 99% of the work since adoption by the IETF has been =
ironing out=20
> RFC4122's problems and nothing major related to UUIDv6/7/8 which are =
all in a=20
> very good state.

And also


> On 22 Jan 2024, at 09:22, Nikolay Samokhvalov <nik@postgres.ai> wrote:
>=20
> And many libraries are already including implementation of UUIDv7 =E2=80=
=93 here are some examples:
>=20
> - https://www.npmjs.com/package/uuidv7
> - https://crates.io/crates/uuidv7
> - https://github.com/google/uuid/pull/139

So at least reviewing patch and agreeing on chosen methods and constants =
makes sense.


Best regards, Andrey Borodin.=