Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tlaPa-000LiD-QD for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 21:18:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tlaPZ-00GVDM-3h for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 21:18:17 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tlaPY-00GVDE-Ll for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 21:18:16 +0000 Received: from smtp.outgoing.loopia.se ([93.188.3.37]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tlaPW-000246-0E for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 21:18:16 +0000 Received: from s807.loopia.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050042C1D73 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 22:18:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from s979.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.5]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53412C3F01; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 22:18:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from s898.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.5]) by s979.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E314A10BC446; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 22:18:12 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amavis.loopia.se X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 tagged_above=-999 required=6.2 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: s898.loopia.se (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yesql.se Received: from s899.loopia.se ([172.22.191.6]) by s898.loopia.se (s898.loopia.se [172.22.190.17]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id LW7WZJGILRTR; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 22:18:12 +0100 (CET) X-Loopia-Auth: user X-Loopia-User: daniel@yesql.se X-Loopia-Originating-IP: 89.255.232.193 Received: from smtpclient.apple (customer-89-255-232-193.stosn.net [89.255.232.193]) (Authenticated sender: daniel@yesql.se) by s899.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E5092C8B9F9; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 22:18:12 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yesql.se; s=loopiadkim1707475645; t=1740172692; bh=++W5Q5gwizwygtuAK5Mwzx4YbjaAg7KVECoie77W9gQ=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=GYHR4TDpI/tQvHSEGXNEKjjZOa/bbqJYw2TKaw87bAE1Q+rw37/LfrQ0Q3CDWGUhD H0S8NO0DcqVl2VdykQLipM0PZe64HyHpkOIWYKRvbz3dIeClHL9VBYmp8uenln98UK nj6ual9h7MqvDA7LQ8tCpynVhuQ/t9RDIEUxGTw4IddaNMubMw026jBJ7pybon6RZm k+JDZgMD9bNLF46MGMYB9dWdehZhea2Qm7iUwvGvyxsCiSXquMaaHfeokMtlsgwIzn 6Xl3LzrPwYVtvQ7bCtknCbwmaajOjJJvZpcVfoA5X7x7ndhw10cX6QxlKjP39Oj6bx o8qh+/zZXVIcQ== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51.11.1\)) Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER From: Daniel Gustafsson In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 22:18:01 +0100 Cc: Jacob Champion , Peter Eisentraut , Antonin Houska , PostgreSQL Hackers Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <83C44AB4-24B0-437F-B139-B5CBC5821BB1@yesql.se> <2A1511A0-C04B-47E4-B1C3-54C2A1C765B8@yesql.se> <13F329B6-86BC-40A5-96F4-102784A0357A@yesql.se> To: Andres Freund X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51.11.1) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk > On 21 Feb 2025, at 18:18, Andres Freund wrote: > One question about interruptability. The docs say: > .... > Afaict the only real way to do safely across platforms is to never = call > blocking functions, e.g. by using non-blocking sockets and waiting for > readiness using latches. Fair point, we'll work on a proposed new wording for this. > And a second one about supporting !CURL_VERSION_ASYNCHDNS: >=20 > Is it a good idea to support that? We could block building instead of the current warning, but that's at = best what we can do. I spent some time skimming over package definitions for the = major distributions ans OS's and couldn't find any that use sync dns. -- Daniel Gustafsson