Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s5QIR-005JoG-Rj for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 May 2024 13:28:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s5QIQ-00FIYA-4v for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 May 2024 13:28:22 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s5QIP-00FIWs-OA for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 May 2024 13:28:22 +0000 Received: from smtp.outgoing.loopia.se ([93.188.3.37]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s5QIM-000L84-BU for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 10 May 2024 13:28:20 +0000 Received: from s807.loopia.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37203014105 for ; Fri, 10 May 2024 15:28:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from s980.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.6]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D102E29265; Fri, 10 May 2024 15:28:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from s471.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.5]) by s980.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06BD2201650; Fri, 10 May 2024 15:28:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amavis.loopia.se X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 tagged_above=-999 required=6.2 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: s471.loopia.se (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yesql.se Received: from s979.loopia.se ([172.22.191.6]) by s471.loopia.se (s471.loopia.se [172.22.190.35]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with UTF8LMTP id TZuoodaY4Lec; Fri, 10 May 2024 15:28:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Loopia-Auth: user X-Loopia-User: daniel@yesql.se X-Loopia-Originating-IP: 89.255.232.193 Received: from smtpclient.apple (customer-89-255-232-193.stosn.net [89.255.232.193]) (Authenticated sender: daniel@yesql.se) by s979.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3EB4110BC4B8; Fri, 10 May 2024 15:28:14 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yesql.se; s=loopiadkim1707475645; t=1715347694; bh=qcYf+a+lmJT7MfTQpqwfS/CGR/vv+BzgQjg+suih3Wo=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=KPOmyb6YV25vQFpYTeZyDWH23brJ3qgUrRxCEy+ywmMcUlJtu9RKVB8gK2i6yxu9p R0qL4drkhNGusOyDTYF+LbNK/KFaI2Os3Arh3ruRhq3TSXE+EqVYzFBui6tjIQHbew f6ktY69M6CX/cfSq5gNVfz3tBpzcWp5lqHgnN3tUGB3XP6UFlmQk37onzvZstkn7wo TGx64v/xR5uObDTbdu4To/5hYm+yTnryM2YrikMoH23UNq6qZlggh+YfuZjlwadDn1 9yBvMcEnBlsi18tbUBMll6RN3Y2Gy1c1JLwDdXNioRiUJAwF+03iSmoGYJ+9Gr7gHK Qh4XYzvGqmEVg== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\)) Subject: Re: open items From: Daniel Gustafsson In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 15:28:03 +0200 Cc: Robert Haas , PostgreSQL Hackers Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Melanie Plageman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk > On 10 May 2024, at 14:48, Melanie Plageman = wrote: >=20 > On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:28=E2=80=AFPM Robert Haas = wrote: >>=20 >> Just a few reminders about the open items list at >> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_17_Open_Items -- >>=20 >> * Incorrect Assert in heap_end/rescan for BHS. Either the description >> of this item is inaccurate, or we've been unable to fix an incorrect >> assert after more than a month. I interpret >> = https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/54858BA1-084E-4F7D-B2D1-D15505E512FF= %40yesql.se >> as a vote in favor of committing some patch by Melanie to fix this. It's indeed a vote for that. >> Either Tomas should commit that patch, or Melanie should commit that >> patch, or somebody should say why that patch shouldn't be committed, >> or someone should request more help determining whether that patch is >> indeed the correct fix, or something. But let's not just sit on this. >=20 > Sorry, yes, the trivial fix has been done for a while. There is one > outstanding feedback on the patch: an update to one of the comments > suggested by Tomas. I got distracted by trying to repro and fix a bug > from the section "live issues affecting stable branches". I will > update this BHS patch by tonight and commit it once Tomas has a chance > to +1. +1 -- Daniel Gustafsson