Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uABsK-00ByNk-IV for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 18:09:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uABsI-00FT9U-IH for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 18:09:39 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uABsI-00FT9D-53 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 18:09:39 +0000 Received: from smtp.outgoing.loopia.se ([93.188.3.37]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uABsH-000Owm-1K for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 18:09:38 +0000 Received: from s807.loopia.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4721036C42E for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:09:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from s981.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.6]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4A936C891; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:09:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from s898.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.5]) by s981.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2809022B179C; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:09:36 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amavis.loopia.se X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 tagged_above=-999 required=6.2 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: s898.loopia.se (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yesql.se Received: from s980.loopia.se ([172.22.191.6]) by s898.loopia.se (s898.loopia.se [172.22.190.17]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id o-71rrNFGl-x; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:09:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Loopia-Auth: user X-Loopia-User: daniel@yesql.se X-Loopia-Originating-IP: 89.255.232.193 Received: from smtpclient.apple (customer-89-255-232-193.stosn.net [89.255.232.193]) (Authenticated sender: daniel@yesql.se) by s980.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59B5722016BB; Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:09:35 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yesql.se; s=loopiadkim1707475645; t=1746036575; bh=6pVURiObqHB7dGuErJV3UMMkmCYxN/Fa404nsxekyn8=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=OMDnv0JReM36De3dDQAR2DFmqDontvRRXdHMbshBlp4OR1jBBVY6ZH27Epmb5Dopg fO8Z9A2Vp1GFRFuL+mJaAk7YWafWzcviJl6kVLzWaiBZ6LXU39AN+9UPNF9mE7VfH/ M8A/zo8f3o0GKNGLigwSDcqN1kx9HgdDywcmhEqMAU3w+0ausz9xauS92wpA4+gyBs 7l7zPOkimFe1sXwts4jVMv0P2es/If0G6r86kDmDVh5dqBi7uut2puKeQ2hG+R7i2o oLagwGQlgrCnNGmvMMeQYeyfTBsawCs8d6XVVqUueQshmQZw3XbyEgDQvbgVUbBHDT rX9GmZAvqe98g== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51.11.1\)) Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER From: Daniel Gustafsson In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:09:28 +0200 Cc: Christoph Berg , Jelte Fennema-Nio , Peter Eisentraut , Andres Freund , Tom Lane , Bruce Momjian , PostgreSQL Hackers , Thomas Munro , Nazir Bilal Yavuz , Antonin Houska , Wolfgang Walther , =?utf-8?B?RGV2cmltIEfDvG5kw7x6?= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <8210C830-DDBB-4CD7-AB39-F5F59C36D547@yesql.se> To: Jacob Champion X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51.11.1) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk > On 30 Apr 2025, at 19:59, Jacob Champion = wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 5:55=E2=80=AFAM Daniel Gustafsson = wrote: >> Nitpick, but it won't be .so everywhere. Would this be clearar if = spelled out >> with something like "do not rely on libpq-int.h when building = libpq-oauth as >> dynamic shared lib"? >=20 > I went with "do not rely on libpq-int.h in dynamic builds of > libpq-oauth", since devs are hopefully going to be the only people who > see it. I've also fixed up an errant #endif label right above it. That's indeed better than my suggestion. > I'd ideally like to get a working split in for beta. +Many > Barring > objections, I plan to get this pushed tomorrow so that the buildfarm > has time to highlight any corner cases well before the Saturday > freeze. I'll try to kick the tyres a bit more as well. -- Daniel Gustafsson