public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <[email protected]>
To: 'Masahiko Sawada' <[email protected]>
To: shveta malik <[email protected]>
Cc: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
Cc: vignesh C <[email protected]>
Cc: Shlok Kyal <[email protected]>
Cc: Nisha Moond <[email protected]>
Cc: Ashutosh Sharma <[email protected]>
Cc: David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Smith <[email protected]>
Cc: Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) <[email protected]>
Cc: YeXiu <[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Lawrence Barwick <[email protected]>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Skipping schema changes in publication
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 11:50:39 +0000
Message-ID: <OS9PR01MB12149EA0C749BC29C7C949E32F544A@OS9PR01MB12149.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD21AoCC8XuwfX62qKBSfHUAoww_XB3_84HjswgL9jxQy696yw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJpy0uB20MhJJEaPJdm31t4fykJ+fChA_76jU2P9HX5knbJvAA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAD21AoCC8XuwfX62qKBSfHUAoww_XB3_84HjswgL9jxQy696yw@mail.gmail.com>

Dear Sawada-san,

> I'm still unsure that the syntax like TABLE (t1, t2) for the exclusion
> list is syntactically correct. The syntax of TABLE (...) is already
> used in a quite different way as follows (borrowed an example from
> stats_import.sql):
> 
> CREATE FUNCTION stats_import.pg_statistic_get_difference(a text, b text)
> RETURNS TABLE (relname text, stats stats_import.pg_statistic_flat_t)
> BEGIN ATOMIC
>   WITH aset AS (SELECT * FROM stats_import.pg_statistic_flat(a)),
>        bset AS (SELECT * FROM stats_import.pg_statistic_flat(b))
>   SELECT a AS relname, a_minus_b::stats_import.pg_statistic_flat_t
>   FROM (TABLE aset EXCEPT TABLE bset) AS a_minus_b
>   UNION ALL
>   SELECT b AS relname, b_minus_a::stats_import.pg_statistic_flat_t
>   FROM (TABLE bset EXCEPT TABLE aset) AS b_minus_a;
> END;
> 
> Wouldn't it be more appropriate to use a plural form or the IN
> keyword, such as EXCEPT TABLES (t1, t2) or EXCEPT TABLES IN (t1, t2)?

But there is an existing syntax to list target tables, FOR TABLE t1, t2, t3...,
which does not have the plural. Current rule is to use the singular for
specifying the exact table, and we follow.

> Or if we might want to add multiple items in the EXCEPT clause in the
> future we can have parentheses around all exclusion items as follow:
> 
> CREATE PUBLICATION pub FOR ALL TABLES EXCEPT (TABLE t1, TABLE t2,
> TABLES IN SCHEMA s1);
> CREATE PUBLICATION pub FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA s1 EXCEPT (TABLE t1,
> TABLE
> t2), TABLE t3;

I agree those alternatives could work, but one downside is the redundant use of
"TABLE" when many tables are excluded. If we want to stay consistent with the
existing style, perhaps we could write it as:

```
CREATE PUBLICATION pub FOR ALL TABLES EXCPET (TABLE t1, t2, t3);
```

Because we have already been accepting the syntax like "FOR TABLE t1, t2, t3".

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

view thread (377+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: RE: Skipping schema changes in publication
  In-Reply-To: <OS9PR01MB12149EA0C749BC29C7C949E32F544A@OS9PR01MB12149.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox