X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DAA475A45 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 18:47:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from torque.intervideoinc.com (mail.intervideo.com [206.112.112.151]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1594A475458 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 18:47:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ronpc [63.68.5.2] by torque.intervideoinc.com (SMTPD32-5.05) id A22840012E; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 16:07:20 -0700 From: "Ron Mayer" To: "Bruce Momjian" Cc: Subject: Re: Are we losing momentum? Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 15:38:31 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200304151652.h3FGqSl21166@candle.pha.pa.us> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-18.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE, SMTPD_IN_RCVD autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Archive-Number: 200304/624 X-Sequence-Number: 38114 Bruce wrote: >Having good reference sites is important, and I could list as many >impressive ones as MySQL, but who has time to hunt around and get >permission to list them --- I will tell you who --- the MySQL marketing >guys, while the PostgreSQL guys don't. :-( Is it a good enough benefit to make the ones we already have easier to find? If the content on these pages: http://techdocs.postgresql.org/techdocs/supportcontracts.php http://advocacy.postgresql.org/casestudies/ http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-announce/2002-11/msg00004.php could be integrated and put on an easy to find page in the advocacy area it'd be a lot easier for new people to see. I know PostgreSQL's got at least as impressive a list as MySQL. It's just that you need to dig harder to find it. Ron