public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Ryo Matsumura (Fujitsu) <[email protected]>
To: Aya Iwata (Fujitsu) <[email protected]>
To: 'Pavel Stehule' <[email protected]>
To: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Smith <[email protected]>
Cc: Chao Li <[email protected]>
Cc: Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Termination of Background Workers for ALTER/DROP DATABASE
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2025 10:17:27 +0000
Message-ID: <TYCPR01MB1131647E781856780072FBAE9E8B0A@TYCPR01MB11316.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OS7PR01MB11964C83E8E543743581250B0EAB3A@OS7PR01MB11964.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<OSCPR01MB1496614832F8014EC16FB78D2F5EEA@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<[email protected]>
<OSCPR01MB14966EC12277712131EB8EDF1F5EEA@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<OS7PR01MB11964C8FE9CDCC0F4C9110988EAEEA@OS7PR01MB11964.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<[email protected]>
<OS7PR01MB11964C077A3E61F4887DD3D09EAEFA@OS7PR01MB11964.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAHut+PtbOP_80OPZXCUZO=-pBJSRTmHcQ2MnVTFov1meNbw18Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHut+Pt5BN0LDh7OzbNqh9+zqHBgsrLX+vh-gn+3FKYTFHMvhw@mail.gmail.com>
<TY3PR01MB11969CBD6DF3E0DB820AD4262EAE8A@TY3PR01MB11969.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAFj8pRB_FH-Pcth9XFcpY2OTasVOP-2DfYOsVxL38igw0O4hdg@mail.gmail.com>
<OS7PR01MB119647141272DBF9364A1C5AAEAADA@OS7PR01MB11964.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAFj8pRCRnN4SyZDPbQwTyKZ_kVHfwLG6udCXsXDTG_z9fWwYQg@mail.gmail.com>
<OS7PR01MB119648203BD748ED008FA5BF5EAABA@OS7PR01MB11964.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAFj8pRCn0=jn4yaeg1JoxxxnUNeXm1KCouES8Puq_GgBsXrNTQ@mail.gmail.com>
<OS7PR01MB1196405302B700736580DEE49EAA8A@OS7PR01MB11964.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAFj8pRBk7zTKoxAAKAihNQuimztniWHPyRWHKp2iHq_2hH+dvQ@mail.gmail.com>
<OS7PR01MB11964C83E8E543743581250B0EAB3A@OS7PR01MB11964.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Pavel-san, Iwata-san,
+1 to Allow-background-workers-to-be-terminated
The result is same, so I think it's better to prioritize compatibility.
PGWORKER_PROTECTED would be used in scenarios like the following:
Existing features are probably not designed to be forcibly stopped.
Therefore, all existing features should have PROTECTED applied to them.
Most newly implemented features will also have PROTECTED applied because it requires less thought and is safer.
Only considerate developers of features that can easily guarantee safety would adopt the default.
In conclusion, this is no different from BGWORKER_INTERRUPTABLE.
Therefore, I think it's better to prioritize compatibility.
Best Regards
Ryo Matsumura
view thread (67+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Termination of Background Workers for ALTER/DROP DATABASE
In-Reply-To: <TYCPR01MB1131647E781856780072FBAE9E8B0A@TYCPR01MB11316.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox