public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: [email protected] <[email protected]>
To: 'Masahiko Sawada' <[email protected]>
Cc: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
Cc: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 01:13:45 +0000
Message-ID: <TYCPR01MB837314CD88ECC298874D5CCBED3C9@TYCPR01MB8373.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD21AoBRt=cyKsZP83rcMkHnT498gHH0TEP34fZBrGCxT-Ahwg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<CAA4eK1Jwn5hhgHJWZ9n+wYyQEk+brfR1zkuqLjh=waji8RYWAw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAD21AoAqEt=TbUDY96Uhf9pNuh-NDR_3-CByd+xR=tFEq==1NA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAD21AoA-MVZcMA1iYwbtvTCOHx1SwG8amQUTT8j2ssh2zuc6OQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAD21AoDTO3bJvrc39Tv3VCeyUzZpimXnJuRhHQhKyjOWorHeOA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAD21AoA_r+Wc-zJZdy4Lii3oOvvdGcLwrY=2Y4y63HueYSd6Eg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAA4eK1+j00Pc+p=AfJLXh-a+OJ-a0UD4adMr2tRkQvKG_LggHA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAA4eK1J3dhfMRNQ6Q585nFr1vmXaTXVW9qv4hmUxLwDwJp-9RQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAD21AoAtrgBEUU08VvfzRnGS+=9rS=MEq1cTLaZ1OT51xX34dQ@mail.gmail.com>
<TYCPR01MB8373D12532FEECDAFDD5BA2BED3B9@TYCPR01MB8373.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAD21AoBRt=cyKsZP83rcMkHnT498gHH0TEP34fZBrGCxT-Ahwg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday, February 22, 2022 11:47 PM Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 9:22 PM [email protected]
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > (4) doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml
> >
> > <row>
> > <entry role="catalog_table_entry"><para
> role="column_definition">
> > - <structfield>last_error_time</structfield> <type>timestamp with
> time zone</type>
> > + <structfield>sync_error_count</structfield> <type>uint8</type>
> > </para>
> > <para>
> > - Last time at which this error occurred
> > + Number of times the error occurred during the initial data
> > + copy
> > </para></entry>
> >
> > I supposed it might be better to use "initial data sync"
> > or "initial data synchronization", rather than "initial data copy".
>
> "Initial data synchronization" sounds like the whole table synchronization
> process including COPY and applying changes to catch up. But
> sync_error_count is incremented only during COPY so I used "initial data copy".
> What do you think?
Okay. Please keep it as is.
Best Regards,
Takamichi Osumi
view thread (40+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: RE: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
In-Reply-To: <TYCPR01MB837314CD88ECC298874D5CCBED3C9@TYCPR01MB8373.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox