Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aokZ3-0004cX-NN for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:32:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aokZ2-0005yM-1o for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:32:04 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aokZ0-0005xg-Ui for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:32:03 +0000 Received: from post.visena.com ([46.226.10.50]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aokYx-0001T6-C3 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:32:01 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=visena.com; s=20141101.wh; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:Message-ID:To:From:Date; bh=nhdSwHPFpT2azTqX/Dbr9lsLKSz+i4MRnMXGuWB3mFM=; b=lFAhQ7B9qTsqcg8hHpiOOHAGkg2A9xiu+85kuL+lEoeFdl1zqEQe5T/JyzzD8Vz2Lht816ygHXAcWC0Bn5WGw5Ufxf8SSXJ8cdgogE5lRF1II+nQLWaX+n9rl+RLVknp6HN4+uk9q9arK0tZfFJSxRSHbiImaCkWPGxjU45Gdhg=; Received: from [10.0.1.10] (helo=tc7-visena.wh.internal.visena.com) by post.visena.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aokYu-0005Ld-DF for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 06:31:58 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=tc7-visena.wh.internal.visena.com) by tc7-visena.wh.internal.visena.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aokYu-0006hZ-Bd for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 06:31:56 +0200 Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 06:31:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Joseph Krogh To: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" Message-ID: Subject: Covering + unique indexes MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Visena Mail 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT X-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Spam-Report: SpamAssasin (score=-1.0, required 5.0 ALL_TRUSTED=-1,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_767_252551092.1460176316314" List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org ------=_Part_765_491376331.1460176316302 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_Part_766_1307368632.1460176316302" ------=_Part_766_1307368632.1460176316302 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_767_252551092.1460176316314" ------=_Part_767_252551092.1460176316314 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Any reason $subject didn't make it (commited but reverted)? =C2=A0 This is a great feature and lots of work seems to have been put into this= =20 patch along with quite some reviewing. It would be nice to know why -hacker= s=20 think it's not ready for 9.6. =C2=A0 Thanks. =C2=A0 -- Andreas Joseph Krogh ------=_Part_767_252551092.1460176316314 Content-Type: text/html;charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Any reason $subject didn't make it (commited but reverted)?
=C2=A0
This is a great feature and lots of work seems to have been put into t= his patch along with quite some reviewing. It would be nice to know why -ha= ckers think it's not ready for 9.6.
=C2=A0
Thanks.
=C2=A0
--
Andrea= s Joseph Krogh
------=_Part_767_252551092.1460176316314-- ------=_Part_766_1307368632.1460176316302-- ------=_Part_765_491376331.1460176316302--