Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1osrz0-0000ck-Sw for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 20:47:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1osryz-0007VN-Ot for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 20:47:37 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1osryz-0007UY-Dc for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 20:47:37 +0000 Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1osryx-0000LE-4I for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 20:47:37 +0000 Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id l6so13991pjj.0 for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 12:47:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NF/v+ayW9IIuVYDo5D7R/h7YxtmAnro4HB9Jar3WZvg=; b=XpQZxp3Sq5sFiI6e06JhOj8I4aGPCc8FTARl9Yck3lqh8yY8MFCS9SglZBJaGjayV5 OxmsS7rFZ5B0Coudpp+8I5JT75BISocMDXO73IffIOqbaEAP6CYJO4mKaHnGRQ0RNwH0 tsHG32ER2RA+pNr8gqLdYyoD/PwjTrE9Qq60xAveEb9h5hNGefY3ls5zlgKNKrh9O9Hx yPMy1TRA7771dOpGeoHp3CiH7s1T4pLvzFv1ZScQRhcV+Ank0PwTp/JiLZ470kcX358f YA/v+wIQouVf5BRt9sUInASdkHysErXST1D6Hcinvty0wCMO0x6f7qlmpuN7+tNvQoA9 DuYw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=NF/v+ayW9IIuVYDo5D7R/h7YxtmAnro4HB9Jar3WZvg=; b=VI3Z8XUkeE9y40uSqeJ252B9LHV4f+Vl4DYeDTCv9IPtyJI8DCgwYi325JvhfCHJrw L2vbLUjzEKs+fbdldCzel+nqoKxjVvhf+efNsz4DmMm+BVOxD/Sp+CaroBuXt0MVMn0Z DJSnGHQTv9ZRRmz+HLK7APkYDhbhnpARLWw120QglpJ5lLKswFAesG6s1iZMUlCH1OcJ WBnbNuR0IBJjWxOHolNGqz0UhbxFoYzC+aVd4HhnE1mFy4KD0pvKDQGmjWBlWkPyHB55 HXNnOciiqjSZwwf+3mbj9vww2r8GocCGA2YBbpURhUBD4rcCzGKV3VNJ4TMRyXykyjNj Yzgw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1rUXBiOCzscavOpcqa6mptdr1i3X7vj3CmPelwyiL/NX2dlsHP B8Ff2eA0dpGcEZXebnaBI78= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5FIBQ4Bp4toIX1e5FzgmGGCeAqXHfF2JdzjWKM8rxk5sUT+HnVIh4CcYr0P3aoeslEDFUU3Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:bf0d:b0:213:cb58:e440 with SMTP id c13-20020a17090abf0d00b00213cb58e440mr58003866pjs.161.1668026852723; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 12:47:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from moubin (97-120-50-207.ptld.qwest.net. [97.120.50.207]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w11-20020a17090a380b00b00213202d77d9sm1621221pjb.43.2022.11.09.12.47.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Nov 2022 12:47:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 12:47:23 -0800 From: Mark Wong To: Tom Lane Cc: Peter Eisentraut , Robert Haas , Greg Stark , Chapman Flack , Ashutosh Bapat , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: real/float example for testlibpq3 Message-ID: References: <2746817.1646088530@sss.pgh.pa.us> <967228.1655408510@sss.pgh.pa.us> <9fde5de1-8560-361b-2107-82d617aa2c99@enterprisedb.com> <1148727.1667308546@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4f9ad8c2-b3b6-4d09-1e05-57b97ced926e@enterprisedb.com> <1991525.1667483722@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1991525.1667483722@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 09:55:22AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut writes: > > On 01.11.22 09:15, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Agreed that the libpq manual is not the place for this, but I feel > >> like it will also be clutter in "Data Types". Perhaps we should > >> invent a new appendix or the like? Somewhere near the wire protocol > >> docs seems sensible. > > > Would that clutter the protocol docs? ;-) > > I said "near", not "in". At the time I was thinking "new appendix", > but I now recall that the wire protocol docs are not an appendix > but a chapter in the Internals division. So that doesn't seem like > quite the right place anyway. > > Perhaps a new chapter under "IV. Client Interfaces" is the right > place? > > If we wanted to get aggressive, we could move most of the nitpicky details > about datatype text formatting (e.g., the array quoting rules) there too. > I'm not set on that, but it'd make datatype.sgml smaller which could > hardly be a bad thing. > > > I suppose figuring out exactly where to put it and how to mark it up, > > etc., in a repeatable fashion is part of the job here. > > Yup. I'll take a stab at adding a new chapter and share how that looks. Regards, Mark -- Mark Wong EDB https://enterprisedb.com