Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ozm61-00061j-SK for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 21:55:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ozm60-0001jv-I9 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 21:55:24 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ozm3t-00051F-BD for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 21:53:13 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ozm3q-0003qi-TP for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 21:53:12 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ozm3q-00GE0k-3t; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 16:53:10 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 16:53:10 -0500 From: Bruce Momjian To: Andrey Borodin Cc: Bharath Rupireddy , Kyotaro Horiguchi , Laurenz Albe , PostgreSQL Hackers , SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM Subject: Re: An attempt to avoid locally-committed-but-not-replicated-to-standby-transactions in synchronous replication Message-ID: References: <20220809.161236.1486509314201074910.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 01:31:39PM -0800, Andrey Borodin wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:59 PM Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > You can prepare a patch, but it unlikely to get much interest until you > > get agreement on what the behavior should be. > > We discussed the approach on 2020's Unconference [0]. And there kind > of was an agreement. > Then I made a presentation on FOSDEM with all the details [1]. > The patch had been on commitfest since 2019 [2]. There were reviewers > in the CF entry, and we kind of had an agreement. > Jeff Davis proposed a similar patch [3]. And we certainly agreed about cancels. > And now Bharath is proposing the same. > > We have the interest and agreement. Okay, I was not aware we had such broad agreement. -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Embrace your flaws. They make you human, rather than perfect, which you will never be.