Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lGuHs-0006tW-8v for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 01:57:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lGuHr-0007f5-11 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 01:57:23 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lGuHq-0007ey-Ql for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 01:57:22 +0000 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lGuHo-0003XM-PK for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 01:57:22 +0000 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976D75C0163; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 20:57:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 01 Mar 2021 20:57:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm1; bh=Gtv6uCLZg0UKoODieG/ywrN4gK8 t/eRyJMecQaDMtks=; b=IfEFiZDIr5oCXGlB4uTzq5wezpwEjJUwBWq45fNr48z M+kfMP9O3G2MBSz5G2nJrqzX8Oc4gLjghGaW6sb2cT86+l/60FR3iR1ay9nZxvF6 Sbub9jsJiJNzXZvOd+8FgAc9kTKtGK7NqC6BlwllFk4DbhxN0W9sV+0JTDGhOC2v t6e0AJAyUK52I5zlHzu2HeAmOxOKnrGK8OJ5gflTDI7ygf4xAFXG6x8HYS6H0PbQ cVOE900mHfAtrbt+wHS67t1cU4WrvmeJNENsIxo+W4/5nrMTKtysdkg23opZLA85 Nc5UsY5FtHGIfiaHGH07DWwadXCSNK6bjvrb1Z2M5hA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Gtv6uC LZg0UKoODieG/ywrN4gK8t/eRyJMecQaDMtks=; b=V97nDQ0fASxjdCuQ01mybX CNpsbgKEliRlZDnKjr76+r9TvghD7lzWmhgq7l2a8INy3WRzHDCmiAhfNvq/sB8a lGrHNmpI7NErPmAAwto0mbdWgBXAhwo0Fd3vJXs55x6gXRXkxR4V4WC45eiuiGAv B+xDpqTW1vn5TJKYqWsCzNzqP5EINrTcNwzLqWBBMWeGNFIQllCudgzubzlHXKBI 4RBXoxevSOeqmdFsP7G0rdYgHgGuJB0yCZIwFumWH0CSp1xQ7skDaDO2l5W3d8G1 4N3FmD+RihX2ZRIJ9i8SnJylAYoFJzhpL9qsQe85wT5XEUamJ6x8ZY23Cb76syug == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrleelgdegtdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfg hrlhcuvffnffculdejtddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddv necuhfhrohhmpefoihgthhgrvghlucfrrghquhhivghruceomhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqh huihgvrhdrgiihiieqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvdegudeuhfdtueeltedtveejheeh ieevueeigeelteegleejleeiueeiheegvefhnecukfhppeduuddurddutddvrddukedtrd dukeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep mhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqhhuihgvrhdrgiihii X-ME-Proxy: Received: from paquier.xyz (ee0822lan1.rev.em-net.ne.jp [111.102.180.185]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E78901080063; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 20:57:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 10:57:13 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Justin Pryzby Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Bruce Momjian , Thomas Munro Subject: Re: doc review for v14 Message-ID: References: <20210210235557.GQ20012@telsasoft.com> <20210222080345.GA23313@telsasoft.com> <20210301004647.GF20769@telsasoft.com> <20210301043354.GJ20769@telsasoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zkumIy5ItaERZ7uW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --zkumIy5ItaERZ7uW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 03:17:40PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > You could say here "Checksums can be enabled", but "normally" does not > sound bad to me either as it insists on the fact that it is better to > do that when the cluster is initdb'd as this has no downtime compared > to enabling checksums on an existing cluster. I looked at that again this morning, and the last version sent upthread still looked fine to me, so I have just applied that. Thanks for caring about that, Justin. -- Michael --zkumIy5ItaERZ7uW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAmA9m3kACgkQnvQgOdby QH1GYw/+KZKbSom57o8WDtjygcoccaLQa6QqLImuqZhk3E3c35McpHLiFUxCm0+5 ZsUlFrPiJrG87mYaCjJbKPqiBbIKpNMTOZWo1I2kKeh5EyENBF47lyBcJe8b8Q+a TZRDXg3f9UeWIBugorM29ais7fSwLZIpGY3zv4KDszVbLTuUWaNEr0Pn4zrKvkic Tg71SFTL27ftbkDlstUExPyVn0NNWdeWvVfzCj9deMDbRfz8r+SIiUNr3gmlmjH9 P/WJKpv9umwAACMnWBmU4kT/COmk25nFmfS8zZkiIgjjFo1QVLX4ZPErgZVp3Faf kACHNQ/dldmUjlw1BqBYYiEKY79UyzSPIuLpuNA8Tw4QqrEZtlxbgQfWlHuZwLCa mU8Npwzvsxl9cBCCYondywEHveoZNBUphZE5ArMy6ibc+QRePHz18HJgBxYSXVjL ElOBr/AbdFwPSmq/cUMyHhR26eEaouOLFEyW0cXbqVPA9tk05wam4QcG5BymNxTl 1P9BpqSyG8olWxNa4ClcREfCXGKvcQ0hYFeJlM7BhsyUwudIFmQHbdrJ+n4Pbnny 20c7Y7BF1QHgK8y9o+U4OJZSUy7NwZV+7tSGC1vYe173m1nWRrkRvwbO5ieX5Dyb f5RLPQ4yzOuhlYAimyaZjYqQaLeNvDyXfuQ5BXiGjrF5UDt8AXI= =TR9b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zkumIy5ItaERZ7uW--