Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mUj7T-0007Pb-U1 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 05:24:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mUj7S-0002FS-TE for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 05:24:02 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mUj7R-0002F0-Gp for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 05:24:02 +0000 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mUj7O-0003jZ-GD for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 05:24:00 +0000 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D785C00CA; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 01:23:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 27 Sep 2021 01:23:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm2; bh=Y7HUWdeLHJadTvu8pZAVGIf66yj bQoPlJnNqPwB8FZg=; b=ICCdS0KV4AldLNnTYejG5ZkFNDVoloqeVq7B67N0uBI KidcB96ZY9d87YfZ78CRHs/zR8+Z41CtM/ffRRFDzrCODtV9d/pdqH2t06r3hLrR Bb/PyVlL4pfBNT/WR2mHZiPmfdLp+JStqWSx/ygcpO3h8VZ491DHjrR9KOMKSmjK VKLkd2UTpOMKyvljmTjRQLj5TDi/H1s+1blUh/b0Svtoca2uyNYUarJgQFQueiuh Ivb+wgITyFAzOKhawm7ogs/n2TmIPuNbELIOn1gyukNbWsvujC1jup3wNS9fc8GX o306sD5p2fnA7HZ34iRRkbxlSZ7U6yeKN3SCuAiv6Rg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=Y7HUWd eLHJadTvu8pZAVGIf66yjbQoPlJnNqPwB8FZg=; b=Q1LaVBeu9WWPdLy0UQ1hbS UxLqCoLK582kUS0jyNXnF3bZfaf8AeVOkJYENa9QxYLsj8nUiK145lm2dWU40wFd jpQHsyfxJvd5UQ/i7XuWOOFvD7fQDqS8t92d8yelD1yrQozBC/z3BUhoJF0dJXoq dj2uGhcH9UtN1UEiUjxywUBSmEGbLoieqB2UK+FcTqaV0h2MKAoNe47uuiXuwVf8 sj1B0ORyYNvcfmYNC2cTX3uYIT6YF3GSCByvcxgZ9nekuR9szE66sxkT3wncKuFM b1ebsaaypWXj0hk8bPWb/DseK2G2kc+47LUz+mHCSC3L7xI7LiieyoQhQQlMZT2g == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudejjedgleegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne gfrhhlucfvnfffucdljedtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddt vdenucfhrhhomhepofhitghhrggvlhcurfgrqhhuihgvrhcuoehmihgthhgrvghlsehprg hquhhivghrrdighiiiqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvgeduuefhtdeuleettdevjeeh heeiveeuieegleetgeeljeelieeuieehgeevhfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmihgthhgrvghlsehprghquhhivghrrdighiii X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 01:23:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:23:50 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Justin Pryzby Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Tomas Vondra , Andres Freund , Zhihong Yu Subject: Re: typos (and more) Message-ID: References: <20210924215827.GS831@telsasoft.com> <20210926170116.GZ831@telsasoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="K9aE0eQgkp2Doebd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --K9aE0eQgkp2Doebd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 09:24:27AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Yes, thanks for compiling all these. The two changes committed were > the only user-visible changes, which is why I have hastened this part > to include those fixes. The rest could just go on HEAD. I have looked at the full set, and applied 0003, 0006, 0009, 0010 and 0011. 0001 has been discussed separately, and I am really not sure if that's worth bothering. 0002 may actually break some code? I have let 0004 and 0005 alone. 0007 could be related to the discussion where we could just remove all those IDENTIFICATION fields. The use of "statistic", "statistics" and "statistics object" in 0008 and 0012 is indeed inconsistent. The latter term is the most used, but it sounds a bit weird to me even if it refers to the DDL object manipulated. Simply using "statistics" would be tempting. -- Michael --K9aE0eQgkp2Doebd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAmFRVWYACgkQnvQgOdby QH1qDw//Y/MFXp+g+bD1uQfnqZ8a+lapJ/Qj0CFiaytQ2OiTBJVnfh6z38ZxfaAx bf69CDV7GXmDNUxtTH+mQOHayIZ53OS/OS+DH2YIRBor1WQIKCmrEiI4FHRAK4Xe JVgn5YPY5oqlVQGRmG4eGdCpE8TA6/Hu/5aIbJA6IpP8zDwK+Y7QJ46BVkpTrDwf Kd87Ah4qUDkwRpYsXtEPAXyD7r329kbiNejzObSOSTQkGD3GYG55fjlggjXyKmFu jo9U/BD2NvPVfA7BplIlVZvow2yG/0T/LeSIfJNLr30mn+oQphd1W43ispIbgTOV 2Rqy7xhx4f936/+SWyir0ndxOToPnL8UWzGSz9D4GtRtAX8K+KqZdf2Uy+dt+yQ8 NCAWf77mS+i5gLHBEdDV1cfZDrknnVl1BOMBB9ivcvN6sKRy4rQZIdgmo6SaHW0z eBHI84Eu+2RxGjH7GWkaJVimavFuy1tjYyGpPR4wu8sWobKb91bPnB37nAO1PtRy mXuJ3y0mIo+Y9R4m26m6tKbMaqxu3JTe5H9ROjiSyzVEgOclQGKH5JQTH4CAqFZb dKCsojP6XSkCUXTeGEJblZYOFEvbZXUrmjdOhG8S2O9WQKj1I1wL1h17TKsiJIre tLrxuTWDT6W/4beWH1cnbvXabU+ya4wX02CSwNR6ugZ54FviELQ= =TpYt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --K9aE0eQgkp2Doebd--