Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nqY3q-0004Vl-An for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 10:34:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nqY3o-0003mj-4T for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 10:34:44 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nqY3m-0003ma-Dm for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 10:34:43 +0000 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nqY3i-000711-Um for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 10:34:42 +0000 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384305C00F8; Mon, 16 May 2022 06:34:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 16 May 2022 06:34:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1652697276; x=1652783676; bh=TTR4uzl2HE mYrU7rLHxolecGCgupXT0piX7xiqGtxOQ=; b=I9VccwKngIVBhtOH9+AmhrrtpU pJhv6xOxuR1SnM0O3FZcRgNelUGBuzAxXMfCTz4DSzWHhxvkOHQMcMtxpkxtKvG8 5nIz+3KEUfqoOyuBYUM2vlXxZJTm5Pejid4ZrlVnkmWiMEa+c9dwH5BQcux6cHFe CeYjdA17/iNrBU2rUt8AK5kLtBAqjZSLMh9XBtNFjJU5NqsJvjzVNvqVQTN6wHsw wxNXj71NmrlnhKpz35KA5rzJpHdlbyR41PhrVvdI38GRj+Tr/zaVwC34VaR4uHWE j+xiFW/VKL4gBHwunWMuPZQA5vFDy0gW4uVI6IdeNm78L+Dku1focwn6F+3Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1652697276; x= 1652783676; bh=TTR4uzl2HEmYrU7rLHxolecGCgupXT0piX7xiqGtxOQ=; b=z OjjlLHk3Tqdb00VIg0cqULgdfyuBXQnAIFvN41Xz99g8SOLqjDQx2qD+g8Aq5gu3 +LmWybAABOuS0adFJrp+Oyuv4/rM/ItHKG7ZCg6wQFX3heWsfLDFRPNKhvLWYtc1 1YlBsiXJpbs0NFXFEnmWVLIIu57zt//EDyiKf7le56j/S5XtXR7sYvGGrvbvAByD f2gnVhUa7CtfNJ1hAipZD2Abh6bbm9tjXfe4wGTAPNii9/m2uAP++u+76paNIMGL zXKwzONdKIJKWW4LFPF0OcU5Q1p3lzez57QAn4bSmNF/Gq59QDk8iFj2GfBmiXT0 k/weGzTJFBNkPVkysz2Bg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrheehgddvlecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfg hrlhcuvffnffculdejtddmnecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddt vdenucfhrhhomhepofhitghhrggvlhcurfgrqhhuihgvrhcuoehmihgthhgrvghlsehprg hquhhivghrrdighiiiqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeetleeifedufffhhfdtteelgeeg geffhfekueevteeigfduudevudetgfegiedvjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmihgthhgrvghlsehprghquhhivghrrdighiii X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 16 May 2022 06:34:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 19:34:31 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Thomas Munro Cc: Postgres hackers Subject: Re: Remove support for Visual Studio 2013 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="l9peT04Zhgd41vhX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --l9peT04Zhgd41vhX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 08:46:31PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: > Looking at the published lifecycle info, 2017 is the oldest still in > 'mainstream' support[4], so it wouldn't be too crazy to drop VS 2015 > too, just like those other projects. That said, it sounds like there > is no practical benefit to being more aggressive than you are > suggesting currently (as in, we wouldn't get to delete any more crufty > untestable dead code by dropping 2015, right?), so maybe that'd be > enough for now. FWIW, one of my environments is using VS2015, because I have set it up years ago and I am lazy to do this setup except if I really have to :) The code works as far as I know, still I am not really excited about cutting support for more versions than necessary, particularly as this does not simplify the C code more. -- Michael --l9peT04Zhgd41vhX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAmKCKLcACgkQnvQgOdby QH1dAA/+K6tb2LFasco8noVgwVIGgMvZsomBUjT9Sxg4B8VCL5piDjgKQOtTEBOO LxdYHNKbPAp8JDE10ZzPx3F5AjOwAQHq56wRFIzIKyDNO7swca7Y9zsNpfkhBsrj 7yBo1csh70Gi2NypUHQ/vhEPKH6gzD5GlvtdxRZkJQwqb77ko0qe4TTpD6Oq1/Yn cpS8p2TTZ5C7cwMY5AWvKmPbPj+YN0b0gYmfB1auMiHMV7HqU00gii3TN1ym5/vi yZslhxa8y69EPOOm7ahOLcPExq0uPa9bf2stuKbJDON9fgr2TpSrlAax1lMoZ/zc 89U985XSHyxiendvRkCcVx8d6RcFOEpQjaI+oCh0Da3Yr10vWiKrdoaaepH65tXS di4/rc9jQxinHvNpOED6CwhBMAiGdZvn11t+/yZClx+TLYCgsyuzcXwkk19GkFCl vDZHcyUMTDWWHKO1tQ7hWkrNu9XnoWdZUZaHSPrJQbG5rJK0AzeqG/2IzKIuGF7v GNscbwDNWc3+yoj8o/J9vTeawCo7DPa+z/IOVrzF+nxwCrqLiutgGieEJ9lOyxCu I2uRYcxhoX5hLCYBAphbUfQSQ7xg3Aq1AW/BNb2m8vmxedFEhNUIOak+SqDRFBOG E1YTI/fPe2J7/VID75jINhdA6PCMr0Blx0t/PjKJbEUauWvYTHY= =Km4H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l9peT04Zhgd41vhX--