public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <[email protected]>
Cc: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <[email protected]>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: per backend I/O statistics
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:52:03 +0900
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>

On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 03:47:59PM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> === Remarks
> 
> R1: as compared to v5, v6 removes the per-backend I/O stats reset from 
> pg_stat_reset_shared(). I think it makes more sense that way, since we are
> adding pg_stat_reset_single_backend_io_counters(). The per-backend I/O stats
> behaves then as the subscription stats as far the reset is concerned.

Makes sense to me to not include that in pg_stat_reset_shared().

> R2: as we can't merge the flush cb anymore, only the patches related to
> the stats_fetch_consistency/'snapshot' are missing in v6 (as compared to v5).
> I propose to re-submit them, re-start the discussion once 0001 goes in.

Yeah, thanks.  I should think more about this part, but I'm still kind
of unconvinced.  Let's do things step by step.  For now, I have looked
at v6.

+        view. The function does not return I/O statistics for the checkpointer,
+        the background writer, the startup process and the autovacuum launcher
+        as they are already visible in the <link linkend="monitoring-pg-stat-io-view"> <structname>pg_stat_io</structname></link>
+        view and there is only one of those.

This last sentence seems unnecessary?  The function is named
"backend", and well, all these processes are not backends.

+    /*
+     * Maybe an auxiliary process? That should not be possible, due to
+     * pgstat_tracks_per_backend_bktype() though.
+     */
+    if (proc == NULL)
+        proc = AuxiliaryPidGetProc(backend_pid);
[...]
+        /*
+         * Maybe an auxiliary process? That should not be possible, due to
+         * pgstat_tracks_per_backend_bktype() though.
+         */
+        if (proc == NULL)
+            proc = AuxiliaryPidGetProc(pid);

This does not seem right.  Shouldn't we return immediately if
BackendPidGetProc() finds nothing matching with the PID?

+	/* Look for the backend type */
+	for (curr_backend = 1; curr_backend <= num_backends; curr_backend++)
+	{
+		LocalPgBackendStatus *local_beentry;
+		PgBackendStatus *beentry;
+
+		/* Get the next one in the list */
+		local_beentry = pgstat_get_local_beentry_by_index(curr_backend);
+		beentry = &local_beentry->backendStatus;
+
+		/* looking for specific PID, ignore all the others */
+		if (beentry->st_procpid != pid)
+			continue;
+
+		bktype = beentry->st_backendType;
+		break;
+	}

Sounds to me that the backend type is not strictly required in this
function call if pg_stat_activity can tell already that?

+       (void) pgstat_per_backend_flush_cb(entry_ref, nowait);

I'd recommend to not directly call the callback, use a wrapper
function instead if need be.

 pgstat_count_io_op_time(IOObject io_object, IOContext io_context, IOOp io_op,
 						instr_time start_time, uint32 cnt)
 {
+
 	if (track_io_timing)

Noise diff.

 /*
- * Simpler wrapper of pgstat_io_flush_cb()
+ * Simpler wrapper of pgstat_io_flush_cb() and pgstat_per_backend_flush_cb().
  */
 void
 pgstat_flush_io(bool nowait)

This is also called in the checkpointer and the bgwriter and the
walwriter via pgstat_report_wal(), which is kind of useless.  Perhaps
just use a different, separate function instead and use that where it
makes sense (per se also the argument of upthread that backend stats
may not be only IO-related..).

Sounds to me that PgStat_BackendPendingIO should be
PgStat_BackendPendingStats?

+{ oid => '8806', descr => 'statistics: per backend IO statistics',
+  proname => 'pg_stat_get_backend_io', prorows => '5', proretset => 't',

Similarly, s/pg_stat_get_backend_io/pg_stat_get_backend_stats/?

+  descr => 'statistics: reset collected IO statistics for a single backend',
+  proname => 'pg_stat_reset_single_backend_io_counters', provolatile => 'v', 

And here, pg_stat_reset_backend_stats?

 #define PGSTAT_KIND_SUBSCRIPTION   5   /* per-subscription statistics */
+#define PGSTAT_KIND_PER_BACKEND    6 

Missing one comment here.

FWIW, I'm so-so about the addition of pg_my_stat_io, knowing that
pg_stat_get_backend_io(NULL/pg_backend_pid()) does the same job.  I
would just add a note in the docs with a query showing how to use it
with pg_stat_activity.  An example with LATERAL, doing the same work:
select a.pid, s.* from pg_stat_activity as a,
   lateral pg_stat_get_backend_io(a.pid) as s
  where pid = pg_backend_pid();
--
Michael


Attachments:

  [application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (833B, ../[email protected]/2-signature.asc)
  download

view thread (12+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: per backend I/O statistics
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox