Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tSSsh-00GibW-Un for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 03:25:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tSSsg-00HFTz-OL for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 03:25:18 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tSSsg-00HFTk-E1 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 03:25:18 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tSSsd-001Lmh-1l for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 03:25:17 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=momjian.us; s=2024011501; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=cwSWlqnHdLMkntKx+qr5LsygOR2ED0oOUPFpsOoQUzs=; b=D13lrosZwNkz0VzTRd1vOQBBbs KYBJjjTpOzXbTv9wIJkJM6H/GNiuhT6gBvKORHNH0gmCRGL7pK6TGsUysAyhpE5aw08sGIiJoOIhT fll3qIOW7746TGUSZVJM2br/jD067kTVJZpjw0OkHWR/e5J4KM0E0T+sekhK7pAq9fyItBQAsLDp0 eZzCukpbky9SjdVdTneEAiAenURMAhICiPVX0ENbccaMW2sxgMiTm450vTrV1F4Y2+ZeXc2ADdn2/ I7kzU/DvdTS/s0iw40bfo1ZxbOeCrXOVYUaFFRc1y531AE+YhoV+2m17ytETZkbqa50BvK3dgABF3 0wTX2/Ug==; Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tSSsc-007cuR-1p; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 22:25:14 -0500 Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 22:25:14 -0500 From: Bruce Momjian To: Roberto =?utf-8?B?Qy4gU8OhbmNoZXo=?= Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Backport of CVE-2024-10978 fix to older pgsql versions (11, 9.6, and 9.4) Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 10:02:18PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > Do you mean that branches for releases which are EOL are not looked at? > I understand that completely. What I was hoping for here was that > someone who was familiar with the old code might be able to look at my > analysis and either confirm that my conclusion is correct (the behavior > affected by the regression in the first commit was only introduced after > 9.4) or not. > > I did my best to structure my request in such a way that it would only > entail minimal effort to answer, assuming that it was viewed by someone > who had worked on those parts of the code that far back in the past. Agreed. > As far as the five year support timeframe, that is amazing and much > more robust than many (most?) projects. Especially considering the size > and pace of development here. We do have a small (paid) team that tries > to support a specific subset of packages going back longer than 5 years. > > If my request is not reasonable or somehow inappropriate, then please > consider it withdrawn. I think it is good you are asking --- I just don't know if anyone can help. -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.