Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 12:20:06 -0600
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Vin=EDcius_Abrah=E3o?= <vinnix.bsd@gmail.com>
Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Yhuel <frederic.yhuel@dalibo.com>,
	wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx@gmail.com>,
	Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
	"Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih@amazon.com>,
	David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>,
	Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>,
	Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>,
	Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: New GUC autovacuum_max_threshold ?
Message-ID: <Z4ATVuRTHVS8kgvR@nathan>
References: <CAGjGUALGtQ8MoshY6tEUPiAOjWNefBzq61gZ_5Dx-Uai1cC39Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <Zy5N-M2jPIYzPdku@nathan>
 <CAGjGUALGwH9LJUxe+ZbjnW_Cg4B4qyFrXFv+oWYCYnLcwggBJQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <Zy-G7u43r1siVkQ6@nathan>
 <2ca7f9c7-5da9-46cb-9072-39b71bfab948@dalibo.com>
 <CAGjGUAKSvvQA583hk-62HyBRhPvowNbhv5+QiRt+znWMA+5OLg@mail.gmail.com>
 <Z32xZZwOi5pXZjYU@nathan>
 <93f3dab5-caa4-4213-9be0-855d5aaa19bf@dalibo.com>
 <Z37ZlVqUzSapV3ZD@nathan>
 <CAM9Bftw+UQ4QWHWZiGmyEhywX0RN1cPPuwcBeRPWyQzT_Jdifg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAM9Bftw+UQ4QWHWZiGmyEhywX0RN1cPPuwcBeRPWyQzT_Jdifg@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Z4ATVuRTHVS8kgvR%40nathan>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:32:58PM +0000, Vinícius Abrahão wrote:
> Please also provide the tests on the new parameter you want to introduce.

I skimmed around and didn't see any existing tests for these kinds of
parameters, which of course isn't a great reason not to add tests, but it's
also not clear what such tests might look like.  Do you have any ideas?

-- 
nathan