Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 17:57:01 +0800
From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C1lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>,
	Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>,
	Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>,
	Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>, yasuo.honda@gmail.com,
	tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, smithpb2250@gmail.com, vignesh21@gmail.com,
	michael@paquier.xyz, nathandbossart@gmail.com, stark.cfm@gmail.com,
	geidav.pg@gmail.com, marcos@f10.com.br, robertmhaas@gmail.com,
	david@pgmasters.net, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org,
	pavel.trukhanov@gmail.com, Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions
Message-ID: <Z68Tba4x2N2FaER_@jrouhaud>
References: <Z68MtDCGVZi-Qqry@jrouhaud>
 <202502140936.lni5gtrycnzf@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <202502140936.lni5gtrycnzf@alvherre.pgsql>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Z68Tba4x2N2FaER_%40jrouhaud>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 10:36:48AM +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2025-Feb-14, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> 
> > Since the merging is a yes/no option (I think there used to be some discussions
> > about having a threshold or some other fancy modes), maybe you could instead
> > differentiate the merged version by have 2 constants rather than this "..." or
> > something like that?
> 
> Maybe the representation can be "($1 /*, ... */)" so that it's obvious
> that the array extends beyond the first element but is still
> syntactically valid.

Yeah that works too and it's probably way easier to implement.