Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1poWtV-0001Kl-3a for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 22:00:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1poWtT-0006cE-Kc for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 22:00:15 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1poWtT-0006c4-5x for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 22:00:15 +0000 Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1poWtQ-003VUj-2Y for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 22:00:14 +0000 Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-7606d6b3294so224107139f.2 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 15:00:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telsasoft-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1681768810; x=1684360810; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Xaejxn24JsnK2TchCIvMGl5EgcsGk4Jjd4YNjW1bQCM=; b=bGjKRTYrXQkM++Rmg1/wWWcOdOtixorWuZkAsX3gMJdasi1Xn4FWVJdc1bk7T0Ns5k f2U0q389VnKCKabAC9ubbZQ8V8h0X9bf6rI/aanRN3Qg5LM+cU7tm9H3YEq1fqz8eE2o usos0Mtf8ZMWkx0cvXak1L1YCCSsvp+4tfnnBsQe8HonvWFfDrSudRetdExzwplwTrUf eQ42CrO19y/8Cj8C5j5YqyCh1DGP0hPfuprIwXoD5NJ+CT0gagr4f3IVO2qjrs4Bim1C l7AymtzkaOVlbSM/J9SxoJ8eBevPj6wa9emcAuLn/mSlVN+s3vwV9UXjVZRQJ/7Na1L4 MwUQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1681768810; x=1684360810; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Xaejxn24JsnK2TchCIvMGl5EgcsGk4Jjd4YNjW1bQCM=; b=UiW5CNoZQWC2yANd3fqvZbQqqummpGQkKqh5dMJKi71/dO6A3qI8kRLD2sClhBNza+ 7xB8vgQPYH4LPlqoKkl6+NAlCHNPOn8k9KGRTdv+VANT+o84bBwCoTr5uRCLkYRZLwwH XkC1QJeWbUPixMblWTNncm0Mjy4Y90WwA/i76L4+bxKJ2AVCI7JyjB1ssxkZbMGnWtr9 cnjbKs2cFdohYYGGSzNpKA/NVdqYk1AMCfBOUqRqAa0SHMLrQfL5U1z2NgCPuhmX9VH9 tJAs24Awj4Ch+LomRhFSJ04dXaATD1DOAnGIgvXRtOdxWmAxsy1G4A0Ec2i9+CA0j5f3 Rrfw== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9cwBBps0hyC0w83Y2oB6WPoVrE/j0AZjjkFJ9guwLG7N0Hsczav L/QoAk+FWsL2NCyJAKwHF3DtUg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350aWNoaDx8aqTTJnb3OwoCWmT1beyG1us4Ug9eG8pYvHbVK2GQD4bVa1A2FLAny0vmLxWkEdsA== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:6110:0:b0:763:5523:e89d with SMTP id v16-20020a6b6110000000b007635523e89dmr16171iob.18.1681768810025; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 15:00:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pryzbyj.telsasoft (charmander.telsasoft.com. [50.244.222.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ci15-20020a0566383d8f00b0040fa75e5a3fsm1098259jab.132.2023.04.17.15.00.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 17 Apr 2023 15:00:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pryzbyj.telsasoft (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8BF89800594; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 17:00:08 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 17:00:08 -0500 From: Justin Pryzby To: Tom Lane Cc: Andres Freund , Matthias van de Meent , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: v16dev: TRAP: failed Assert("size > SizeOfXLogRecord"), File: "xlog.c", Line: 1055, PID: 13564 Message-ID: References: <2444561.1681748021@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2454846.1681753830@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2454846.1681753830@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 01:50:30PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > > Yeah, I just came to the same conclusion. One thing I don't understand > > yet: log_newpage_range is old (it looks like this back to v12), and > > that Assert is older, so why doesn't this reproduce further back? > > Maybe the state where all the pages are new didn't happen before? > > Bingo: bisecting shows the failure started at Just curious: what "test" did you use to bisect with ?