public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Justin Pryzby <[email protected]>
To: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Should we remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age?
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:33:01 -0500
Message-ID: <ZDWLvS1GghESoX/[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:00:48AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> I don't know whether others think we should apply it this release, given the
> "late submission", but I tend to think it's not worth caring the complication
> of vacuum_defer_cleanup_age forward.
I don't see any utility in waiting; it just makes the process of
removing it take longer for no reason.
As long as it's done before the betas, it seems completely reasonable to
remove it for v16.
--
Justin
view thread (7+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Should we remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age?
In-Reply-To: <ZDWLvS1GghESoX/[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox