Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qCbcA-0000bJ-2s for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 07:53:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qCbc8-0005Rf-Kc for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 07:53:52 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qCbc6-0005RW-Vf for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 07:53:52 +0000 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qCbbz-004Ac4-Gd for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 07:53:50 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E17A3200302; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 03:53:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 23 Jun 2023 03:53:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1687506819; x=1687593219; bh=zp pHyYdb2L1MscHaDdfH3BBkXUs736pDxTom07rP4Gg=; b=PPOD1Xd4Kf1N6tiIML hSu4E3dReSqLglO6x8VdPwXOfF1quX7NfVoKdaHzcfTa5qbI8Bb58p33EVtMK/H7 ZxIgqTTUrdt9AkOLXD+t/MZoO5I8rBPdjgVeQtum2xqzZe6NvpqdoraSBDUIvm3Z skesnapcZqohZvgWrvN7YgP1eLNKK2B6PXXxUCn71GiC64RWXOmDzVP79Rjk7bkF wbQc7icxnpnZLjZw3Rxoj4mglnt4pd5LGmRdZ4kGPy4UB0962eJsBHXaS+xZqTBp 7naVgJ6CnUzuDLHZEu0wJ4Mavkj5cgDpUE1Lg4tv+bOxwP+syQoD3DusUJocqrnn 8ulw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1687506819; x=1687593219; bh=zppHyYdb2L1Ms cHaDdfH3BBkXUs736pDxTom07rP4Gg=; b=mrEjp9S6hw9ZnbBDQI2kBx9tZ+t39 dM5o1nav9GeUGuodx/6aTzVc/j3J5RLFnON5/+sKT6fe176KMLPcJF1Q5l85INZJ 6COvNugS+2vQiD4VYzmvt5uMXKFFhdOv1juNLDhDTngt5jaIzu1QbGh1sveRIAAO ljrYrxGWpk25K/YhR7m095Y1wr16PlyVFKLqd+NmzCzrd7yxNzdiibJ7TYd3zNxC NxOUgzEAnzi91Bz5DzjmjoMKrheeY4a7ARcZrgiNXxW9YfwSOMdu9TgP97RGMBW7 IMnllOGbQnnsZwGAyVPgEziaiZausdoA6qdG39YgE5HfTHLIqCwADCKcg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrgeegfedgkeduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne gfrhhlucfvnfffucdljedtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehgtdorredt tddvnecuhfhrohhmpefoihgthhgrvghlucfrrghquhhivghruceomhhitghhrggvlhesph grqhhuihgvrhdrgiihiieqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffduleehgefhkeefgfeftdfh kedutddvhfdukeeggeehieekffelhfelkeehteefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqhhuihgvrhdrgiih ii X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i0fe9450f:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 03:53:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 16:53:30 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Jelte Fennema Cc: jian he , Dmitry Igrishin , PostgreSQL Hackers , Daniele Varrazzo Subject: Re: Deleting prepared statements from libpq. Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ahuNxYE+nfyBdMSh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --ahuNxYE+nfyBdMSh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 09:39:00AM +0200, Jelte Fennema wrote: > To be clear, it didn't actually change the behaviour. I only changed > the error message, since it said the exact opposite of what it was > expecting. I split this minor fix into its own commit now to clarify > that. I think it would even make sense to commit this small patch to > the PG16 branch, since it's a bugfix in the tests (and possibly even > back-patch to others if that's not a lot of work). Yes, agreed that this had better be fixed and backpatched. This avoids some backpatching fuzz, and that's incorrect as it stands. -- Michael --ahuNxYE+nfyBdMSh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAmSVT3oACgkQnvQgOdby QH0udw/+MIf51B/lUs8djJyUckEPiM2l743m+nUcuJj3AVj7aBGPW8QpoT1JQqtZ QID4zGVCpbtVLC+4PFwm/fdtoGI7TjfolOlLJrQfPx1rt3MgB7+en+1LCOLavAdC I9B/P0pVJpANKEky55h8WVlrneOisudFG9Wyxc7BYjRpxBdoYFG5HmKk7spLKgvb r/tVQWO1kmM3MDAjlM53aa3fLz+FnGfvgdnTXMcargco4qLH9JkL784eDHAlWKr2 fQgv32SPIRmcaHLcqpMfox9HEO1FOsttOCrXDkXqbT8dMhto7txFIpENaVHy0Uxp 3z/8t520Vdn6VzHTp5zCHCuPbiM0pc6o1NQibEUB1dWQTEUnlzqWDfmS+H0tR3br VinJfl9nnGmWcKPjdAogs40mwLwJ/zsRdLsm8OloYMYGC2y2oMZQ6ddtRv63UyZh cljk6PC/JracOMYapU6RfAoEYZnKHQXeq8KacWrZle7W7gv+0rvTzU0i60RfpJay sCdk10Dd+g4Iu+WBhKmOrnFRsNhOMMm40AL1CzypdWc8SQTo5fm1asZm/frLM1GX RLevk4rpzw+ip9c3J0pvkv/rfPd36fLCzil45JNH6RF+ZoGAz1EgyGhQfXbeZN4O 3KdTRHI+scYpL1u/Awr+OjLtpVA2uYq4pw6BuE+Fzx9GTFIl1DY= =qakm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ahuNxYE+nfyBdMSh--