Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 17:07:45 -0400
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>,
	Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?= <ilmari@ilmari.org>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Obsolete reference to pg_relation in comment
Message-ID: <ZRNIIf2MiEcXeAee@momjian.us>
References: <87sf9apnr0.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org>
 <20230726205031.GD3310393@nathanxps13>
 <1948637.1690406048@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <ZPjPUJBj+SVCPFfN@momjian.us>
 <C7D6C832-23B2-4550-8D6B-7D09B525141A@yesql.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C7D6C832-23B2-4550-8D6B-7D09B525141A@yesql.se>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ZRNIIf2MiEcXeAee%40momjian.us>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep  7, 2023 at 10:44:25AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 6 Sep 2023, at 21:13, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 05:14:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> >> I think we should reword this to just generically claim that holding
> >> the Relation reference open for the whole transaction reduces overhead.
> > 
> > How is this attached patch?
> 
> Reads good to me, +1.

Patch applied to master.  I didn't think backpatching it made much sense
since it is so localized.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.