public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
To: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Munro <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Lowering the default wal_blocksize to 4K
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 19:26:54 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 04:08:05PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> There's an alternative approach we could take, which is to write in 4KB
> increments, while keeping 8KB pages. With the current format that's not
> obviously a bad idea. But given there aren't really advantages in 8KB WAL
> pages, it seems we should just go for 4KB?
How do we handle shorter maximum row lengths and shorter maximum index
entry lengths?
--
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
view thread (2+ messages)
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Lowering the default wal_blocksize to 4K
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox