public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
To: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: Jacob Champion <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Berg <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Munro <[email protected]>
Cc: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <[email protected]>
Cc: Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 11:22:21 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a7apd2ywdtigk56cxtvmg4xhxktkqhhubgzljwpmmf3dlpztkp@mr7l2vx6i222>
References: <[email protected]>
<CAOYmi+=YjmfJ+U6RTHfiXEFt9xJzaHnnbNSgSKahWr774_xGdA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAOYmi+kt5UvPOXXXT9w_nHBNgcqiTQWS2j=D9qJaewvmO4iaAg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAOYmi+m2-2TH5AP7-8Knm_gcSiEaZVPGeUkfZeCLmYH395MYgA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CAOYmi+mrYnuwMEnpYWA4FWFtDCe4rMKavDrKQPpV43u=zmR8Xg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<a7apd2ywdtigk56cxtvmg4xhxktkqhhubgzljwpmmf3dlpztkp@mr7l2vx6i222>
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 11:20:11AM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2025-04-08 11:13:51 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 08:04:22AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 7:32 AM Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Uh, where are we on the inclusion of curl in our build? Maybe it was
> > > > explained but I have not seen it.
> > >
> > > The above is discussing a patch to split this into its own loadable
> > > module. Andres and Christoph's feedback has been shaping where we put
> > > that module, exactly.
> >
> > Uh, I was afraid that was the case, which is why I asked. We have just
> > hit feature freeze, so it is not good that we are still "shaping" the
> > patch. Should we consider reverting it? It is true we still "adjust"
> > patches after feature freeze.
>
> You brought the dependency concern up well after the feature was merged, after
> it had been in development for a *long* time. It wasn't a secret that it had a
> dependency on curl. I don't think it's fair to penalize a feature's authors
> to not finish implementing a complicated and completely new requirement within
> 17 days.
Fair point --- I was just asking.
--
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
view thread (194+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox