public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
To: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: Wolfgang Walther <[email protected]>
Cc: Jacob Champion <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Berg <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Munro <[email protected]>
Cc: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <[email protected]>
Cc: Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 14:25:20 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cpwbapxle5tjjb2dk26ggipsmhm2scfcekxomvizwb4ntzmcyn@ppw4ordz25sz>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CAOYmi+mrYnuwMEnpYWA4FWFtDCe4rMKavDrKQPpV43u=zmR8Xg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAOYmi+m-q8VOPsFxB3D-CWf-T057h4XLqVPvCTudXyAj7-9vpA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAOYmi+mn_xhkQEyS5KG3zoSOrvskVx8mhD8x_Z+0LL9PaZo1gQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<cpwbapxle5tjjb2dk26ggipsmhm2scfcekxomvizwb4ntzmcyn@ppw4ordz25sz>
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 02:11:19PM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2025-04-08 13:02:11 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 06:57:18PM +0200, Wolfgang Walther wrote:
> > > Jacob Champion:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:32 AM Wolfgang Walther <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > And that should also not be a problem for distributions - they could offer a libpq and a libpq_oauth package, where only one of them can be installed at the same time, I guess? *
> > > > My outsider understanding is that maintaining this sort of thing
> > > > becomes a major headache, because of combinatorics. You don't really
> > > > want to ship a libpq and libpq-with-gss and libpq-with-oauth and
> > > > libpq-with-oauth-and-gss and ...
> > >
> > > That would only be the case, if you were to consider those other
> > > dependencies as "dangerous" as cURL. But we already depend on them. So if
> > > it's really the case that cURL is that much worse, that we consider loading
> > > it as a module... then the combinatorics should not be a problem either.
> > >
> > > However, if the other deps are considered problematic as well, then the ship
> > > has already sailed, and there is not point for a special case here anymore.
> >
> > Yes, I think this is what I am asking too. For me it was curl's
> > security reputation and whether that would taint the security reputation
> > of libpq. For Tom, I think it was the dependency additions.
>
> I'd say that curl's security reputation is higher than most of our other
> dependencies. We have dependencies for libraries with regular security issues,
> with those issues at times not getting addressed for prolonged amounts of
> time.
I see curl CVEs regularly as part of Debian minor updates, which is why
I had concerns, but if it is similar to OpenSSL, and better than other
libraries that don't even get CVEs, I guess it okay. However, is this
true for libpq libraries or database server libraries. Does it matter?
--
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
view thread (199+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox