public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bertrand Drouvot <[email protected]>
To: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
Cc: Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) <[email protected]>
Cc: shveta malik <[email protected]>
Cc: Ajin Cherian <[email protected]>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Smith <[email protected]>
Cc: Nisha Moond <[email protected]>
Cc: Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <[email protected]>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Cc: Ashutosh Sharma <[email protected]>
Cc: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:51:28 +0000
Message-ID: <ZbJLQGQ0ZEwsUS/[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA4eK1K0jRXa2AhKXRVDY+Y42MG4RTbfAEcTBEGN2ov=Yjco+A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA4eK1JZDtRFPJaeaLvj74760pcvaEAVxNPN0+oW5A4jL1WCBg@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAA4eK1JPB-zpGYTbVOP5Qp26tNQPMjDuYzNZ+a9RFiN5nE1tEA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJpy0uAmbh_1pH-eG5bTbHXXq9w-uNV45DT-12TTh9kGj2HeCw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFPTHDbsZ+pxAubb9d9BwVNt5OB3_2s77bG6nHcAgUPPhEVmMQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJpy0uBqS_HD30mBR0yD1SVCvUZDrw1=dwn1xH8ANEQw7gnPdw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA4eK1Lxvfq9RwOEsguiMCrKPUc1He9UGz1_wi0N0cJaXFa4Eg@mail.gmail.com>
	<OS0PR01MB5716E304C26E6ACE0BE84925947A2@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAA4eK1K0jRXa2AhKXRVDY+Y42MG4RTbfAEcTBEGN2ov=Yjco+A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 03:54:45PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 1:25 PM Bertrand Drouvot
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 02:57:30AM +0000, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) wrote:
> > >
> > > Agreed. I split the original 0001 patch into 3 patches as suggested.
> > > Here is the V68 patch set.
> 
> Thanks, I have pushed 0001.
> 
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Some comments.
> >
> > Looking at 0002:
> >
> > 1 ===
> >
> > +      <para>The following options are supported:</para>
> >
> > What about "The following option is supported"? (as currently only the "FAILOVER"
> > is)
> >
> > 2 ===
> >
> > What about adding some TAP tests too? (I can see that ALTER_REPLICATION_SLOT test
> > is added in v68-0004 but I think having some in 0002 would make sense too).
> >
> 
> The subscription tests in v68-0003 will test this functionality. The
> one advantage of adding separate tests for this is that if in the
> future we extend this replication command, it could be convenient to
> test various options. However, the same could be said about existing
> replication commands as well.

I initially did check for "START_REPLICATION" and I saw it's part of 
006_logical_decoding.pl (but did not check all the "REPLICATION" commands).

That said, it's more a Nit and I think it's fine with having the test in v68-0004
(as it is currently done) + the ones in v68-0003.

> But is it worth having extra tests which
> will be anyway covered in the next commit in a few days?
> 
> I understand that it is a good idea and makes one comfortable to have
> tests for each separate commit but OTOH, in the longer term it will
> just be adding more test time without achieving much benefit. I think
> we can tell explicitly in the commit message of this patch that the
> subsequent commit will cover the tests for this functionality

Yeah, I think that's enough (at least someone reading the commit message, the 
diff changes and not following this dedicated thread closely would know the lack
of test is not a miss).

> One minor comment on 0002:
> +          so that logical replication can be resumed after failover.
> +         </para>
> 
> Can we move this and similar comments or doc changes to the later 0004
> patch where we are syncing the slots?

Sure.

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com





view thread (119+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
  In-Reply-To: <ZbJLQGQ0ZEwsUS/[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox