public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
To: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 13:33:18 +0900
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 03:33:36PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> Well, you can't just do that, because there's only one caller, namely
> CopyToTextOneRow(). What I am trying to suggest is something like the
> attached, just a quick hacky POC. Namely to split out CSV support from
> CopyToTextOneRow() by introducing CopyToCSVOneRow(), and to avoid code
> duplication by moving the code into a new CopyToTextLikeOneRow().
Ah, OK. Got it now.
> I named it CopyToTextLike* here, because it seems confusing that some Text*
> are used for both CSV and text and others are actually just for text. But if
> were to go for that, we should go further.
This can always be argued later.
> To test the performnce effects I chose to remove the pointless encoding
> "check" we're discussing in the other thread, as it makes it harder to see the
> time differences due to the per-attribute code. I did three runs of pgbench
> -t of [1] and chose the fastest result for each.
>
> With turbo mode and power saving disabled:
> Avg Time
> HEAD 995.349
> Remove Encoding Check 870.793
> v13-0001 869.678
> Remove out callback 839.508
Hmm. That explains why I was not seeing any differences with this
callback then. It seems to me that the order of actions to take is
clear, like:
- Revert 2889fd23be56 to keep a clean state of the tree, now done with
1aa8324b81fa.
- Dive into the strlen() issue, as it really looks like this can
create more simplifications for the patch discussed on this thread
with COPY TO.
- Revisit what we have here, looking at more profiles to see how HEAD
an v13 compare. It looks like we are on a good path, but let's tackle
things one step at a time.
--
Michael
Attachments:
[application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (833B, ../[email protected]/2-signature.asc)
download
view thread (13+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox