Feedback-ID: i0fe9450f:Fastmail
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:53:27 +0900
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: "Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>,
	Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>,
	pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
	Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>,
	Sergey Prokhorenko <sergeyprokhorenko@yahoo.com.au>,
	=?utf-8?Q?Przemys=C5=82aw?= Sztoch <przemyslaw@sztoch.pl>,
	"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>,
	Mat Arye <mat@timescaledb.com>,
	Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>,
	Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov@gmail.com>,
	Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: UUID v7
Message-ID: <Ze_t1zQA7veSKPGr@paquier.xyz>
References: <1971811009.2132347.1706599708209@mail.yahoo.com>
 <72C1E7CB-E2EC-46CF-AD2C-B3180CED885B@yandex-team.ru>
 <CAEG8a3JUgkY3EMp393kJ+bcye8q=VHfQDTQz7Ci-moNVjhPLZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <0906F8BA-CA52-4956-AA68-E9193E50DFDF@yandex-team.ru>
 <10553e4c-6b66-44b9-86a7-80bb1958a767@eisentraut.org>
 <BFDA918D-1CB0-4980-A31F-C1AC95BE68F6@yandex-team.ru>
 <5D22C2BF-5DED-43CA-A3D7-B724EE0A159D@yandex-team.ru>
 <CAJ7c6TPOOpr-39CNz32oC_ruEAiqhPZ=PBe0OE+d-W4wjBabWA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGECzQRYit62xO=HqX7kAf8tELjZTsYc0LQ1LStUsaKSPqJu_w@mail.gmail.com>
 <844E6A65-4A36-4A36-94C2-0CDF7615B53F@yandex-team.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+orguMnn8nxJem5R"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <844E6A65-4A36-4A36-94C2-0CDF7615B53F@yandex-team.ru>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Ze_t1zQA7veSKPGr%40paquier.xyz>
Precedence: bulk


--+orguMnn8nxJem5R
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:27:43PM +0500, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
> Sorry for this long and vague explanation, if it still seems too
> uncertain we can have a chat or something like that. I don't think
> this number picking stuff deserve to be commented, because it still
> is quite close to random. RFC gives us too much freedom of choice.

Speaking about the RFC, I can see that there is a draft but nothing
formal yet.  The last one I can see is v14 from last November:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-uuidrev-rfc4122bis-14

It does not strike me as a good idea to rush an implementation without
a specification officially approved because there is always a risk of
shipping something that's non-compliant into core.  But perhaps I am
missing something on the RFC side?
--
Michael

--+orguMnn8nxJem5R
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=mmXu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--+orguMnn8nxJem5R--