public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
To: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]>
Cc: Jacob Champion <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Munro <[email protected]>
Cc: Postgres hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:37:35 +0900
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 12:53:43PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> If everything is addressed, I agree that 0001, 0003, and 0004 can go into
> PG17, the rest later.
About the PG17 bits, would you agree about a backpatch? Or perhaps
you disagree?
--
Michael
Attachments:
[application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (833B, ../[email protected]/2-signature.asc)
download
view thread (25+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox