Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 17:37:25 -0400
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
Message-ID: <Zj6TlcF_aikz4JIL@momjian.us>
References: <ZjxLJpnH4VMkOMmi@momjian.us>
 <CAGECzQTz5aUqLEL6daLd2Hu2FXS_LOSh4keDndJ1fwThsb_b5w@mail.gmail.com>
 <Zj6PvZWzkTsCwNMS@momjian.us>
 <1641606.1715376693@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1641606.1715376693@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Zj6TlcF_aikz4JIL%40momjian.us>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 05:31:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 06:50:54PM +0200, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> >> There are two commits that I think would benefit from being listed
> >> (but maybe they are already listed and I somehow missed them, or they
> >> are left out on purpose for some reason):
> 
> > I looked at both of these.   In both cases I didn't see why the user
> > would need to know these changes were made:
> 
> I agree that the buffering change is not likely interesting, but
> the fact that you can now control-C out of a psql "\c" command
> is user-visible.  People might have internalized the fact that
> it didn't work, or created complicated workarounds.

It was not clear to me what the user-visible behavior was with the
SIGINT control.  Yes, based on your details, it should be mentioned.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.