public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephen Frost <[email protected]>
Cc: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <[email protected]>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]>
Cc: vignesh C <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Pyhalov <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Partial aggregates pushdown
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 13:35:43 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TY2PR01MB3835CB1D110362A3213E5F6795D22@TY2PR01MB3835.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAGECzQRVuUZEhPL+rzY0_0UKEaZ-sFFkLJ6GN+bad+im2r9=uQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<TYAPR01MB308841016A3F1AE8247BAA6495C02@TYAPR01MB3088.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
	<CAGECzQSXXKVCQ13jHXtmk=PMsJHhFGb78PoT3JiT4eAcoLXxoA@mail.gmail.com>
	<TY2PR01MB383585CACD74F2106A0563C195CB2@TY2PR01MB3835.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
	<CAGECzQSKMO9C8-9Eo-feE3BJTF68EWKHXY4-xf_5BMKm8yAHPw@mail.gmail.com>
	<TY2PR01MB38353E34056D0F91736F358395D42@TY2PR01MB3835.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
	<CAGECzQTnfUdRO21CkwZeMowFZC3zQ9+dhNp3EB-G52=BXJvyPg@mail.gmail.com>
	<TY2PR01MB3835DE59D4654A499A5A699795D52@TY2PR01MB3835.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
	<CAGECzQT=CjkORFaZuBn4Db9CRt9C_EpB2isadmx_iNS3ZzQMwg@mail.gmail.com>
	<TY2PR01MB3835CB1D110362A3213E5F6795D22@TY2PR01MB3835.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>

On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 09:42:19PM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 6:09?PM Jelte Fennema-Nio <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 4. Related to 3, I think it would be good to have some tests of
> > PARTIAL_AGGREGATE that don't involve postgres_fdw at all. I also
> > spotted some comments too that mention FDW, even though they apply to
> > the "pure" PARTIAL_AGGREGATE code.
> > 5. This comment now seems incorrect:
> > -    * Apply the agg's finalfn if one is provided, else return transValue.
> > +    * If the agg's finalfn is provided and PARTIAL_AGGREGATE keyword is
> > +    * not specified, apply the agg's finalfn.
> > +    * If PARTIAL_AGGREGATE keyword is specified and the transValue type
> > +    * is internal, apply the agg's serialfn. In this case the agg's
> > +    * serialfn must not be invalid. Otherwise return transValue.
> >
> > 6. These errors are not on purpose afaict (if they are a comment in
> > the test would be good to explain why)
> >
> > +SELECT b, avg(a), max(a), count(*) FROM pagg_tab GROUP BY b ORDER BY 1;
> > +ERROR:  could not connect to server "loopback"
> > +DETAIL:  invalid connection option "partial_aggregate_support"
> Fixed.

Is there a reason the documentation is no longer a part of this patch? 
Can I help you keep it current?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <[email protected]>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.






view thread (45+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Partial aggregates pushdown
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox