Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 12:47:41 -0400
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>,
	Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>, daniel@yesql.se,
	pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Doc: typo in config.sgml
Message-ID: <ZyUGLQ1jZ5MtRFnl@momjian.us>
References: <Zw1rf7vm3FqpItw4@momjian.us>
 <Zw1_j_jofafQbNKl@momjian.us>
 <20241015101036.d8c29e4aada1c3e92ddcef9d@sraoss.co.jp>
 <Zw6eQxtpXIccYpOQ@momjian.us>
 <f1bc1bcd-a71c-411a-9bfd-8cd6ec2ae007@eisentraut.org>
 <Zw7ScRYKZVj3pBva@momjian.us>
 <4125339.1729027669@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <Zw7j8qpCzVKu60z_@momjian.us>
 <10783d4f-2463-44c1-8140-e0d2f5d3f056@eisentraut.org>
 <Zw_Fsed0h2P9TtLS@momjian.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Zw_Fsed0h2P9TtLS@momjian.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ZyUGLQ1jZ5MtRFnl%40momjian.us>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 09:54:57AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:00:15AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 15.10.24 23:51, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 05:27:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > > > > Well, we can only use Latin-1, so the idea is that we will be explicit
> > > > > about specifying Latin-1 only as HTML entities, rather than letting
> > > > > non-Latin-1 creep in as UTF8.  We can exclude certain UTF8 or SGML files
> > > > > if desired.
> > > > 
> > > > That policy would cause substantial problems with contributor names
> > > > in the release notes.  I agree with Peter that we don't need this.
> > > > Catching otherwise-invisible characters seems sufficient.
> > > 
> > > Uh, why can't we use HTML entities going forward?  Is that harder?
> > 
> > I think the question should be the other way around.  The entities are a
> > historical workaround for when encoding support and rendering support was
> > poor.  Now you can just type in the characters you want as is, which seems
> > nicer.
> 
> Yes, that does make sense, and if we fully supported Unicode, we could
> ignore all of this.

Patch applied to master --- no new UTF8 restrictions.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  When a patient asks the doctor, "Am I going to die?", he means 
  "Am I going to die soon?"