public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Bertrand Drouvot <[email protected]>
To: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: relfilenode statistics
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 06:05:58 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+TgmoZtRxvAuMyO4bQjj5t47XWvQsowPAedkOkrCP61B7mQFg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<Ztk4JIgWKk/8/[email protected]>
<Zt/[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CA+TgmoZtRxvAuMyO4bQjj5t47XWvQsowPAedkOkrCP61B7mQFg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 02:51:10PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 4:27 AM Bertrand Drouvot
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Then I think we should go with the "sometimes I don't know the relation OID
> > so I want to use the relfilenumber instead, without changing the user experience"
> > way.
>
> So does the latest version of the patch implement that principal
> uniformly throughout?
No, please don't look at v6-0001 and 0002 (as mentioned up-thread). The purpose
here is mainly to get an agreement on the design before moving forward.
Does it sound ok to you to move with the above principal? (I'm +1 on it).
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: relfilenode statistics
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox