Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1tBwe4-0078Zh-68
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 13:45:55 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1tBwe1-009wQR-CH
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 13:45:53 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <cb@df7cb.de>)
	id 1tBwe1-009wQJ-2D
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 13:45:53 +0000
Received: from mout-y-111.mailbox.org ([91.198.250.236])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <cb@df7cb.de>)
	id 1tBwdy-0021ni-EG
	for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 13:45:51 +0000
Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::1])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mout-y-111.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XqdZc2Typz9w2V;
	Fri, 15 Nov 2024 14:45:44 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 14:45:42 +0100
From: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
To: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>,
	pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Potential ABI breakage in upcoming minor releases
Message-ID: <ZzdQhiEfMYGpDleZ@msg.df7cb.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>,
	Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>,
	Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
	Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>,
	pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
References: <1976928.1731614974@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <202411142033.u6za5a6ylj2k@alvherre.pgsql>
 <20241114224108.d0.nmisch@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20241114224108.d0.nmisch@google.com>
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4XqdZc2Typz9w2V
List-Id: <pgsql-hackers.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ZzdQhiEfMYGpDleZ%40msg.df7cb.de>
Precedence: bulk

Re: Noah Misch
> I'm hearing the only confirmed impact on non-assert builds is the need to
> recompile timescaledb.  (It's unknown whether recompiling will suffice for
> timescaledb.  For assert builds, six PGXN extensions need recompilation.)

Which 6 extensions are these?

I re-ran the tests on all the extensions on apt.pg.o and didn't see
any failures (timescale and age are already rebuilt).

Christoph