Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>,
 Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
References: 
 <CAHE3wggb715X+mK_DitLXF25B=jE6xyNCH4YOwM860JR7HarGQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <34fa0f1d44222c4c8e2b9552e3fa423a@xs4all.nl>
 <20180301212756.dfju64p3este35o2@alap3.anarazel.de>
From: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Message-ID: <a248f7cd-6ad4-7814-bbd5-2ba4c85e02e5@pgmasters.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 16:51:39 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180301212756.dfju64p3este35o2@alap3.anarazel.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On 3/1/18 4:27 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-03-01 16:27:11 +0100, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>> Very, very useful.  I really do hope this patch survives the
>> late-arrival-cull.
> 
> FWIW, I don't think it'd be fair or prudent. There's definitely some
> issues (see e.g. Craig's reply), and I don't see why this patch'd
> deserve an exemption from the "nontrivial patches shouldn't be submitted
> to the last CF" policy?

I'm unable to find this in the CF under the title or author name.  If it
didn't get entered then it is definitely out.

If it does have an entry, then I agree with Andres that it should be
pushed to the next CF.

-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net