Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p0eHR-0005K2-30 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 07:46:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p0eHP-0001He-VS for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 07:46:47 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p0eHP-0001HU-Li for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 07:46:47 +0000 Received: from wnew3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.17]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p0eHN-0000ck-34 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 07:46:46 +0000 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailnew.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B132B06686; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 02:46:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 01 Dec 2022 02:46:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1669880803; x= 1669888003; bh=Qgw+tdB5PwSWCtT+BtttL0HZXSqFw7wDQD1MUOhLhqg=; b=e bSgXviSs1Cn8nAZQCiNFTiphh0F3Ml0QqFsOpIwSH9g65ELI/J1GnX/wair0gjLt 9ZwlodIpDlN8J9L+wKMpFPotdYW9e8YckbRE1ReZJXgB7r45noKvBtf3nuhOD8HO jwpG25ZvPoH8zs6U9vbXauEZSuDEcjgS5i4qC0ciC5AkbNRWWae/Cdi8nDEHaDb9 qufpXbwUlHJ9Ah2Nay/R8i/WsU+pf8wvl6OPaLTeq6jO+k5DsHKrQGLsTWvlbcx5 sHiWbLBzvmm8fLPZ93UJbTCk6+CZSNUzJIXGBW6d4HGrw266h6NCVt0V8Xe/Iy4k q6kdC+hlafFh75H0bzkXA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrtdeggdduudegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjtgfgsehtkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefrvght vghrucfgihhsvghnthhrrghuthcuoehpvghtvghrrdgvihhsvghnthhrrghuthesvghnth gvrhhprhhishgvuggsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekhfejtdejffduhfel jefhkeefgeetleetjefggeeijeduleeivdetteevgffhffenucffohhmrghinhepphhosh htghhrvghsqhhlrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehm rghilhhfrhhomhepphgvthgvrhdrvghishgvnhhtrhgruhhtsegvnhhtvghrphhrihhsvg gusgdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i131946ab:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 02:46:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 08:46:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0 Subject: Re: WIN32 pg_import_system_collations Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?Q?Juan_Jos=c3=a9_Santamar=c3=ada_Flecha?= Cc: Dmitry Koval , PostgreSQL Hackers References: <0050ec23-34d9-2765-9015-98c04f0e18ac@postgrespro.ru> <639e0abd-ea82-b751-bfba-5166a7a1b304@enterprisedb.com> <20220322010057.w7mzoahyi3jy5dyf@alap3.anarazel.de> <9f1c24f0-9340-8044-94e7-5f5389a53d08@enterprisedb.com> From: Peter Eisentraut In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 10.11.22 11:08, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote: > This looks pretty good to me.  The refactoring of the > non-Windows parts > makes sense.  The Windows parts look reasonable on manual > inspection, > but again, I don't have access to Windows here, so someone else > should > also look it over. > > I was going to say that at least it is getting tested on the CI, but > I have found out that meson changes version(). That is fixed in this > version. > > > Now is currently failing due to [1], so maybe we can leave this patch on > hold until that's addressed. > > [1] > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAC%2BAXB1wJEqfKCuVcNpoH%3Dgxd61N%3D7c2fR3Ew6YRPpSfEUA%3DyQ%40mail.gmail.com What is the status of this now? I think the other issue has been addressed?