Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 11:43:10 -0500
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
	pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org,
	"Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih@amazon.com>,
	Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>,
	"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: allow changing autovacuum_max_workers without restarting
Message-ID: <aBEBniEzYPUXA-yj@nathan>
References: <1353350.1736202977@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <Z3xlNmC3qtwf1lz1@nathan>
 <1359669.1736206603@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <Z3yVFfKG_RAh8FgP@nathan>
 <1386858.1736220547@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <Z31jI10tLLd6thfu@nathan>
 <de722583-4ba4-4063-bc41-e20684978116@eisentraut.org>
 <713236.1745846094@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <aA-TlhU2ZoBBAqc-@nathan>
 <15005c8c-7676-43b7-a440-787b101cfdf5@eisentraut.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <15005c8c-7676-43b7-a440-787b101cfdf5@eisentraut.org>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aBEBniEzYPUXA-yj%40nathan>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 08:36:48AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 28.04.25 16:41, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 09:14:54AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> > My own proposal given the way it works now is to just print
>> > max_connections and not mention autovacuum_worker_slots at all.
>> > Our choice for max_connections is worth reporting, but I don't
>> > feel that everything derived from it needs to be reported.
>> 
>> I'm fine with either of these ideas.  If I had to choose one, I'd just
>> remove the autovacuum_worker_slots report for the reasons Tom noted.
> 
> Yes, removing the report is also fine by me.

Committed.

-- 
nathan