Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 09:30:40 -0500
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com>,
	Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>,
	Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>,
	Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>,
	Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
	Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
	Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>,
	Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
	Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>,
	Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
	alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Statistics Import and Export
Message-ID: <aC81EGFGCX3FSf_p@nathan>
References: 
 <CAExHW5vf9D+8-a5_BEX3y=2y_xY9hiCxV1=C+FnxDvfprWvkng@mail.gmail.com>
 <768b2a237e892bf1334bdcbb066cdc1bd1368cb2.camel@j-davis.com>
 <CAKAnmmKCgnqcd3x4Z+5yXsY7urpDS6D_NZG7pr=DYD=LHt5X4g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+Tgmoap_uDKU6K5ch1m=7fiKiEHhbAHWF4EDMhAVG-qdmi=0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <d7e0869ed38353097293b686ca8d033b36d9c361.camel@j-davis.com>
 <CA+TgmoaFpHyW1ZwCjNxJmvCR0NRMLYCkA=O50BCKLGnC1UcJNg@mail.gmail.com>
 <db541ea000b2371c323c1f5c00ebca2c3a3e28c0.camel@j-davis.com>
 <CA+TgmoYXspGT4dc3jY8B_eJgsT7m=iwqF1i4te3HyG8FdTr1nA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKAnmmL35eCAX-XoqwFzauaoJekyM5aNQpTaWDU2GvjeChkyog@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+TgmoZ9=RnWcCOZiKYYjZs_AW1P4QXCw--h4dOLLHuf1Omung@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+TgmoZ9=RnWcCOZiKYYjZs_AW1P4QXCw--h4dOLLHuf1Omung@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aC81EGFGCX3FSf_p%40nathan>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 10:20:16AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> It also sort
> of looks like we might have a consensus anyway: Jeff said "I lean
> towards making it opt-in for pg_dump and opt-out for pg_upgrade" and I
> agree with that and it seems you do, too. So perhaps Jeff should make
> it so?

+1, I think we should go ahead and do this.  If Jeff can't get to it, I'm
happy to pick it up in the next week or so.

-- 
nathan