Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 15:04:45 -0500
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Shinya Kato <shinya11.kato@gmail.com>,
	"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>,
	Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
	rmt@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
Message-ID: <aEH4XYwrlyvjZUvE@nathan>
References: <Zur4qqhABOXtZS8h@nathan>
 <Zutc67q6my4AXOt2@paquier.xyz>
 <ZuujwbHFor1zLufJ@paquier.xyz>
 <Zv36cbgluA_oZPYq@paquier.xyz>
 <CAOzEurQZ1a+6d1K8b=+Ww1NFQVwAt9KSCQsBWXYBaPnYCenK3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOzEurRRfPaZn_ZGmoDz2C3+74SAhk+FUZo_9oB1Zg_rQNGkYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <aEBxIcAiiDVlQvdx@nathan>
 <aEDjjpritZuv3h2J@paquier.xyz>
 <CAOzEurS=3xu8WV6KRmc-axLn5tUs_5Ggy0DY_Gj8XcFOJTDeWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <aEEjuuIyRTYPp_-q@paquier.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <aEEjuuIyRTYPp_-q@paquier.xyz>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aEH4XYwrlyvjZUvE%40nathan>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 01:57:30PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> How does the RMT feel about this change?  Nathan, would you be OK with
> that?  It's not a big problem, as well, if the code is kept as-is, but
> as it's a simple change..

IMHO a case can be reasonably made that this is an oversight in the related
commit.  I've added the rest of the RMT here in case they see it
differently.

The patch LGTM, too.

-- 
nathan