Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:32:40 -0500
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>,
	Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
	Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>,
	pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump --with-* options
Message-ID: <aEyK6FxJqcv53s8b@nathan>
References: <7cc52488-f876-4ad3-affd-6e4b0ef0cb09@eisentraut.org>
 <aEMLzPQtjRbj2R7X@nathan>
 <CA+TgmoactJEUHeXuxHLKNXHzm6-XrQFigPur-4nHTMFSiSRkiQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <aErpuM6RXSlK1FBW@nathan>
 <1854ffbf-f8eb-4bc3-b9f8-223bbf58c392@oss.nttdata.com>
 <271f899c54d112b353e009286af7c6cdb7c3d609.camel@j-davis.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <271f899c54d112b353e009286af7c6cdb7c3d609.camel@j-davis.com>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aEyK6FxJqcv53s8b%40nathan>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 08:58:04AM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-06-13 at 09:39 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> By the way, if we keep --with-statistics in pg_dump, are we planning
>> to
>> continue using the --with-xxx naming pattern for new options that
>> specify extra data to dump?
> 
> Good point. Now that we are getting rid of some of the other options,
> we don't need to worry about consistency with them, and I think we
> should just use "--statistics".

+1

-- 
nathan