Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 10:21:03 -0500
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: shihao zhong <zhong950419@gmail.com>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Fixes inconsistent behavior in vacuum when it processes multiple
 relations
Message-ID: <aFwT31Rw-Oj-bgO9@nathan>
References: <aFLp9sMEHFHULOFx@nathan>
 <CAGRkXqTp9k_7X1OqqQSnVfoyGxAM3SQ083CcyaezBg9qQ8i+qg@mail.gmail.com>
 <aFRzYhOTZcRgKPLu@nathan>
 <aFS6m1tNH2sGMQ61@paquier.xyz>
 <aFWznvZtYZ3VJxgi@nathan>
 <aFiWUzW8VChL-hGg@paquier.xyz>
 <aFl1AB9ofnQrrckV@nathan>
 <aFn82kXgvwKHncs-@paquier.xyz>
 <aFrSlSz9fi47j5Sr@nathan>
 <aFtRd1Q4QuCWcg5k@paquier.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <aFtRd1Q4QuCWcg5k@paquier.xyz>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aFwT31Rw-Oj-bgO9%40nathan>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 10:31:35AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 11:30:13AM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 10:18:18AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> > Knowing that I'm indirectly responsible for this mess, I would like to
>> > take care of that myself.  Would that be OK for you?
>> 
>> I would be grateful if you took care of it.
> 
> Okay, applied the main fix down to v13 then.

Thanks!

> Attached is the remaining patch for HEAD, planned once v19 opens, and
> the tests I have used on the back-branches as a txt to not confuse the
> CI, for reference.

Looks reasonable to me.

-- 
nathan