Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 09:38:57 -0500
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannuk@google.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani@google.com>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects
Message-ID: <aH5RAeaQJTmPpsrd@nathan>
References: 
 <CAH5HC942o6j1qyVysiBtO+Vpb=XOBPbf3rKqsOLtpDpp0SzjkA@mail.gmail.com>
 <aHAzv9pgJh2Wa3M1@nathan>
 <CAH5HC94tYpgCnoPRYbCGQU0eCM8D7X+aEmB0GZrhjR16JEe5_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <aHEk_JEoNhIpuHd-@nathan>
 <CAH5HC96=3NjeYA5vuj8CyMmiFhU27jgvQ9WgXbUDccrE7xvwYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <aHUvLi_sdfBrxzYh@nathan>
 <700576.1752514083@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <aHVDmAqcwanTAGZa@nathan>
 <aHpwsGXSicLArZSk@nathan>
 <CAMT0RQQmc5KKCYUG4Qa1R2L-Yar=7p_pEROLrEy_SSNkG6eRNw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAMT0RQQmc5KKCYUG4Qa1R2L-Yar=7p_pEROLrEy_SSNkG6eRNw@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aH5RAeaQJTmPpsrd%40nathan>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 02:03:45AM +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Do you think the current patch could be backported to at least some
> latest versions ?

I think that's pretty unlikely.  It'd be a pretty big departure from our
versioning policy.  In the past, we have back-patched "critical"
performance fixes, but that involved changes that had already been in
released versions for years.

-- 
nathan