Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 09:51:40 -0500
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani@google.com>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannuk@google.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects
Message-ID: <aHEk_JEoNhIpuHd-@nathan>
References: <aBkQLSkx1zUJ-LwJ@nathan>
 <aBtzZ4PyccUVCcyA@nathan>
 <CAMT0RQTXiqH7zdQEVSVd2L7_Cw4wQ1eHOD8hfZ+0vecMXJWc-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <aG2ISJC__3lQwRqY@nathan>
 <CAMT0RQStPtHfKwowd88Q0tynX0x=uJSKn=ihP8syhDJ6cH3DHQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <aG6srPib60NzJBeg@nathan>
 <CAMT0RQRT3KkwoQkx=YBdd_o9SqXxOt16fqQsscH_n+40Z57N7w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAH5HC942o6j1qyVysiBtO+Vpb=XOBPbf3rKqsOLtpDpp0SzjkA@mail.gmail.com>
 <aHAzv9pgJh2Wa3M1@nathan>
 <CAH5HC94tYpgCnoPRYbCGQU0eCM8D7X+aEmB0GZrhjR16JEe5_A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAH5HC94tYpgCnoPRYbCGQU0eCM8D7X+aEmB0GZrhjR16JEe5_A@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aHEk_JEoNhIpuHd-%40nathan>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 07:49:47PM +0530, Nitin Motiani wrote:
> Thanks. Looks good to me.

Thank you for reviewing.

> Also just would like to confirm that the pg_dump_sort change will go in a
> different patch.

That's already been committed: http://postgr.es/c/fb6c860.

-- 
nathan