public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
To: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: Noah Misch <[email protected]>
Cc: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Melanie Plageman <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Munro <[email protected]>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes)
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 11:03:55 +0900
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+TgmoYY=w7QGoVnnTLU5p+6jKoAJsOmbvSsgWOiFqSjZAwO3Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <fvfmkr5kk4nyex56ejgxj3uzi63isfxovp2biecb4bspbjrze7@az2pljabhnff>
	<CA+TgmoY6_-LcmkSYwKR2F=+vhr_Z3LYxATrnwioWPSNUjSy6=g@mail.gmail.com>
	<fumdcye25kkobwrjfb6d7m52gvlpzbvomr4onm6nsbcbrv24jg@fqydosoppg4l>
	<[email protected]>
	<CA+TgmoYY=w7QGoVnnTLU5p+6jKoAJsOmbvSsgWOiFqSjZAwO3Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 10:03:08AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> If we were to use the existing PostgreSQL naming convention, I think
> I'd probably argue that the nearest parallel to this level is
> ShareUpdateExclusive: a self-exclusive lock level that permits
> ordinary table access to continue while blocking exclusive locks, used
> for an in-flight maintenance operation. But that's arguable, of
> course.

ShareUpdateExclusive is a term that's been used for some time now and
relates to knowledge that's quite spread in the tree, so it feels like
a natural fit for the use-case described on this thread as we'd want a
self-conflicting lock.  share-exclusive did not sound that bad to me,
TBH, quite the contrary, when applied to buffer locking for aio.

"intent" is also a word I've bumped quite a lot into while looking at
some naming convention, but this is more related to the fact that a
lock is going to be taken, which we don't really have.  So that feels
off.
--
Michael


Attachments:

  [application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (833B, 2-signature.asc)
  download

view thread (57+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes)
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox