Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1utcCP-00B85u-4D for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2025 01:22:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1utcCO-006MRm-9r for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2025 01:22:08 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1utcCN-006MRc-FV for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2025 01:22:08 +0000 Received: from fhigh-a7-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.158]) by makus.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1utcCK-000FMS-2i for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2025 01:22:05 +0000 Received: from phl-compute-06.internal (phl-compute-06.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F937140004A; Tue, 2 Sep 2025 21:22:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-06.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 02 Sep 2025 21:22:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1756862524; x=1756948924; bh=x9Ry1qxr9+ pj0PIOj9VdhpwmGmo78pRtu1X3miieUEU=; b=LHLPTGBD6Za4/fPsu4X1wK7+xI 0basMEsyVaetV5CXwtuOO8c3exUwNRDu9pPzZ/IgNqO0hsHE5j+5XkbsK64Pw4BO GDpMjXBWsl+Gvizj2SFlb4A9dIfkmoXBl3R1GZD7Dhh13KtPZqZV+d4fOXkHwfoS +scpQDjEV1KXw2lZi4odo8hsTBSNVm6gaQtd955q907r/9BIH3TSY4XLY63nBp2H +BTv0rrdzT37uJTWa64iSzgTGNtBtjk3rkgJGsbqS4rHfsxO7AE3taMqf4bMMHL7 eddbPk6tulPuPnKsNat97roK2e9QoUe0ngKsjJtYYwOAdFR6On2N6YuzQYsw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1756862524; x=1756948924; bh=x9Ry1qxr9+pj0PIOj9VdhpwmGmo78pRtu1X 3miieUEU=; b=PvkJXWX8lIG1zWapumLKs4gj3M6IAclVkx3Fidz04PzUXQPFS2/ 4MjLvkmDt3ws/LAsrJvpPqgkq9XzizEJ+k7MOVqCEwSuikm10Ow0zuoVlQVB0oKV 7c7qP14gg25Our2bbt4hc30100nFcmE85EWz6Gaj8/kGLCZmg4bI2t8QjUVEiRP+ KVbP3i665chGpxmrXrA3X7lprslhvRWiBnMHL1Yvm8LJatRN44r2NqHjBfHIx/BC lyTYCsrkTHUqjXnReT08u8t8CkEXMFTYEZ+3U3o3w4L0ufT0kXfCdZYOStRtQ369 U5PQBvFL7vln2urnaw0s1eaHk+JzqIMHsVA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdeggddukedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghi lhhouhhtmecufedttdenucgfrhhlucfvnfffucdljedtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukf hfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefoihgthhgrvghlucfrrghquhhivghr uceomhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqhhuihgvrhdrgiihiieqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepte elieefudffhffhtdetleeggeegfffhkeeuveetiefgudduvedutefggeeivdejnecuvehl uhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhitghhrggvlh esphgrqhhuihgvrhdrgiihiidpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepvddpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphho uhhtpdhrtghpthhtoheprhhjuhhjuhduvdefsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoh epphhgshhqlhdqhhgrtghkvghrsheslhhishhtshdrphhoshhtghhrvghsqhhlrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i0fe9450f:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 2 Sep 2025 21:22:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 10:21:54 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Julien Rouhaud Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Update outdated references to SLRU ControlLock Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TCnXiV7ygoyAIn+h" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --TCnXiV7ygoyAIn+h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 01:19:41PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > I don't really have a preference. Bank lock is shorter but may be a bit more > obscure, especially outside slru.c, so using "SLRU bank lock" could be better > indeed. Okay, I have used "SLRU bank lock" and backpatched that down to v17 where it matters. -- Michael --TCnXiV7ygoyAIn+h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAmi3mDIACgkQnvQgOdby QH2C4w//f8ucBJveTIv0zvw7BcROY7qixCLL67W+616/Sbc9g1Js8ePg+Gxu68ZH IoOTHm49mmztYgpJmrBXEa2kygG1zaJTW/xljhISDnRzvmhbd+SkGmYwtGN4KEsz RxGGvJsacZ8Cbi9YMU3AbevNn1HzLhmIg10xupW/D0IePLRRDjwA0KN+GkN+/KmC I/8L2g/5mjQhRz5ekI/llYzuKOzixzYh0Y8X9nQ12rKGAltlB7R2CAdn4FIbdZzf Gi7Asb+30j/pwsPChED97TK8A+5k53dtjhJmBlaat1O0F+4J7BpLwQY9d4Lmr2j5 oj6bCKmO5Quz2fBUje2IDLVOn2cpfNv4FkGkUSCxDDnj91kWSX0XwCVnWv6RrJhM HoeRQ8k844yv+AioUlyLY4ejFzg1khaISn2Pg+GzSJsFceZIk93yj312ES5VLhN5 Abal+5zBMmsA9/yl0U2poLjVVVjtiBo8FEOB4wY9IwmhrhOGn+/wbiEZzSw67YHv EhcFNOj9DQ52SUMM+EggrLgDJm8hnyRPMf0iaHrVydJuZ1rfK59bD63pToQAj9tq +aJIRb1JDQ6qLvNQb62LB+OOxL7FwTqe4KacjI1/u9DKoc9R5Wa6LQQ8FggtjYO5 ar/yqpSk7D70P09UmMzWOT7kSVLs1g4XMMVz88s7D3pPe2PjJXc= =8NHW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TCnXiV7ygoyAIn+h--