Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1utd94-00BUZc-0y for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2025 02:22:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1utd93-006b9h-7j for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2025 02:22:45 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1utd92-006b9W-Ul for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2025 02:22:45 +0000 Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1utd91-000FsC-2W for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2025 02:22:44 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-b4f8bf49aeaso1835462a12.1 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2025 19:22:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1756866163; x=1757470963; darn=lists.postgresql.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tKfmXhkBEVHGCW2ffNmH3UD8H2722rgFwfi4kN+SpGg=; b=XTKDgjFR7meQAaxIxcupp5WdelwDG3Ga3o/OB06/ZSKnyvobo4kmc3fJmGQ80miBFs 5csklxgXLuq+3bM48OFT7gH91F+hf8/AVcK1s8IQHOZCsZpp5RHBFLSBGk2X1h2Btdee gKKRtPyYo4myCWWVp2Hx28EPUk8hcTyMxY/nx4UKKReM1ewR87Jlg9lMC4SIUbTceh3A BwBYXFIEjdLXAwVk8sFq8UP+kRz1fiDvHacvAllJOv2lAYC1MYDSEbDtanytJv2e7IAr FjRCKICsz8dCr1OX6qPWebVbyJVaLGPuptF7YrKl1F7wDKQwSUl/SBPN5jeP1HSYHHnq s4ZA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1756866163; x=1757470963; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=tKfmXhkBEVHGCW2ffNmH3UD8H2722rgFwfi4kN+SpGg=; b=AHtYYnnC4we4h/kjtXyqzjke1wZ9p9BaGulxHKZZI91tfiiBQbWsbhglpTBY6Xk4we ZuPbW+ZjRPM2um0XMxlxQ3NyxIz1TLnDBochwDJKLHVEpr9Ev3CZFW9+VK2Dzx4K0AsH e2XZx8kh97FBzODVupdJGUy9jeTA5DkejnBakTt1QXzJRJBPwQ5gCHwsgRCCLF7rYdMB JjiWR73T0X7eEg7qwjUbe4+c3p+j9nn4KqhUYjkEIF7iZYDk+YyanaRjmPtUV2ubYGYh Ci++Ujlw4aISJpvHO++7OFMk231+APcgWgCwsGoevQ2lHBoXYHZlfs3Pjh1aDeNi9CO4 N2rw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxEsQoPJquIU6z3TiWrhJvbPHWZTS8ujaG01zlpCMlSXEmbVUda x02fiQFYD11ntL/3GTiRfPtY5J4PHiV1LkAw328fLbCEy33Omp26SzMX X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctN8S8vEgUyBRPA7WPy2AdCDL77uy5sgx2SogQ74m17imTGT3Zkh+MgoCYqHPy /RxTVLshTH8Ytx57sauMzUcZlp9NOcPFK6i7Ondql5A9YIMq4lLXywrT6K6BBRIkqpxiprB9adg lcLt9zW3F4ajb018B4C/ay5L5t3O8Z2fFi59X4wL/u4QOSzJcw8KTh5xxJwr6EryX6P0dVIS2hu PAnTYZsMd59bvoziGFeaxjwo4vNDxbrNjVX+PFoCEuICBLzziTFtxFcmW35w4E3djIGV7ve9z3P q2H0O06vHsxMddgQanKVdvfah4PL0gKeOiJ9SYX8NclJmy1B1FA78qlFe2hB9VH6+M/bEvYl4Jh MSCVcAxUzQI+lVxUL+xiIAEp23w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHAV9GnXriMLrD9yJMidcEtUKNzBDDRjY/Zr+4InusCeFJt5gXcdJJnrlM2MaeOWUVXxSqWZg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e552:b0:24a:f79e:e5eb with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-24af79eeaa3mr91762445ad.49.1756866162609; Tue, 02 Sep 2025 19:22:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jrouhaud ([115.43.41.38]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-24af5ff6edesm48940075ad.78.2025.09.02.19.22.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 02 Sep 2025 19:22:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 10:22:37 +0800 From: Julien Rouhaud To: Michael Paquier Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Update outdated references to SLRU ControlLock Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 10:21:54AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 01:19:41PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > > I don't really have a preference. Bank lock is shorter but may be a bit more > > obscure, especially outside slru.c, so using "SLRU bank lock" could be better > > indeed. > > Okay, I have used "SLRU bank lock" and backpatched that down to v17 > where it matters. Thanks a lot!