Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:25:15 -0500
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Should io_method=worker remain the default?
Message-ID: <aMGma-VYsb2NPUrG@nathan>
References: <d68e2a4f8c356107e5167408ad80eaa2fac0f57d.camel@j-davis.com>
 <adywrhdn5zcfeldzug2pkzbdxizactr46goh4doiztvexrqomy@lgvl26gui63a>
 <a81f2f7ef34afc24a89c613671ea017e3651329c.camel@j-davis.com>
 <1b50102876dc9564049c985cff0ec1903cc8d502.camel@j-davis.com>
 <cmrpnnmbd4tajrg3lfnvzfo224siwyxzc6homaf2bvpmabiln5@jzfsvlsyoqtj>
 <aL85CeasM51-0D1h@nathan>
 <d6267d0d1d14e7d144327ba9b236b99b36bfb6f0.camel@j-davis.com>
 <aMBKPf5rVZTqCSNH@nathan>
 <7b39aabd58d5620d02a260833bfbd8db4fbb101b.camel@j-davis.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <7b39aabd58d5620d02a260833bfbd8db4fbb101b.camel@j-davis.com>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aMGma-VYsb2NPUrG%40nathan>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 04:11:49PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-09-09 at 10:39 -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> My first instinct was to consider this for back-patching, but I see that
>> you didn't back-patch commit 9af672b.  Is there any technical reason we
>> shouldn't be back-patching these types of meson build script changes?
> 
> I think you are right, I can't see any harm in backporting it, and
> arguably it's a bug: it would be annoying to compare performance across
> different versions with different build flags.
> 
> I backported through 16.

Cool.  I committed/back-patched the numeric.c fix to v16 as well.

-- 
nathan